当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 中医论文 >

代综方合穴位埋线对肥胖病(脾虚湿阻型)炎症因子、氧化应激的初步观察

发布时间:2018-01-10 13:33

  本文关键词:代综方合穴位埋线对肥胖病(脾虚湿阻型)炎症因子、氧化应激的初步观察 出处:《成都中医药大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 代综方 穴位埋线 脾虚湿阻型 肥胖病 临床观察


【摘要】:目的:探讨代综方合并穴位埋线干预脾虚湿阻型肥胖病患者的临床疗效,观察代综方口服合并穴位埋线后肥胖患者的疗效,比较治疗前后患者的体重、体重指数、腰围、体重指数的变化;观察干预前后对患者高胰岛素血症的影响,并分析干预措施对肥胖病患者慢性炎症因子、氧化应激、microRNA29的影响。方法:选择符合标准的肥胖病患者,共67例,随机分为对照组和治疗组。对照组,共计34例,在生活方式干预的基础上,口服二甲双胍850mg,一日两次及中药汤剂代综方,1日1剂,连续12周;治疗组,共计33例,在生活方式干预的基础上,口服汤剂代综方及穴位埋线治疗,穴位埋线主穴有两组:①天枢、中脘、关元、足三里、丰隆、梁丘②脾俞、胃俞、肾俞、上巨虚、下巨虚。交替选穴,3周埋线1次,连12周。进行临床12周的观察,记录观察患者的年龄、身高,体重、腰围、大腿围,糖耐量试验数值、胰岛素释放实验数值、血脂以及IL-6、TNF-α、SOD、ox-LDL (Elisa检测法);mir-29 (RT-PCR检测法)等指标的变化。对实验结果采用统计软件进行分析,探讨疗效机理,分析病理机制。结果:1.对照组及治疗组体重的均值分别降低了2.2kg和7kg, BMI分别降低了0.65和2.7,腰围分别降低了3.2cm和5.5cm、臀围降低了5.6cm和7.8cm,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),两组治疗后与基线水平比较均有显著差异(P0.01);2.两组治疗前后CHOL与基线水平比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),两组TG、LDL-C组内、组间比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),两组组内HDL-C升高有统计学意义(P0.05),组间比较无统计意义(P0.05)。3.两组1hINS、hINS显著降低(P0.01), OhINS、3hINS降低有统计学意义(P0.05); OhINS、1hINS、2hINS、3hINS组间比较差异无统计学意义;两组HOMA-IR、ISI有显著改善(P0.01),组间相比计较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),两组HOMA-β组间、组内比较差异具有统计学意义:4.两组IL-6、TNF-α显著降低、SOD显著升高(P0.01), ox-LDL降低有统计学意义(P0.05)5.两组均可下调microRNA-29水平的表达,下调数值差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗组下调水平多于对照组,但差异不具有统计学意义(P0.05)。7.mir-29与BMI、HOMA-IR正相关;8.试验过程中,两组患者肝肾功、血常规等安全性指标未见明显异常,不良反应发生率低。结论:在随机试验中代综方及穴位埋线对超重及肥胖患者均有明显减重、减腰围的疗效,调节血脂,显著改善胰岛素抵抗、增加胰岛素敏感性,并改善肥胖病导致的低度炎症反应及氧化应激:抑制mir-29水平的表达;无明显不良反应。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the clinical effect of combined acupoint catgut implantation in treating obesity patients with spleen deficiency and dampness obstruction, observe the curative effect of Daizhuangfang combined with acupoint catgut embedding, and compare the body weight of patients before and after treatment. Body mass index, waist circumference, body mass index; The effects of intervention on hyperinsulinemia were observed, and the effects of intervention on chronic inflammatory factors and oxidative stress in obese patients were analyzed. Methods: 67 obese patients were randomly divided into two groups: control group (n = 34) and control group (n = 34) based on lifestyle intervention. Metformin 850 mg orally, twice in 1st and traditional Chinese medicine decoction, 1 dose on 1st, for 12 weeks; Treatment group, a total of 33 cases, on the basis of lifestyle intervention, oral decoction comprehensive formula and acupoint catgut embedding treatment, the main acupoint embedding points have two groups: 1 day armature, Zhongwan, Guan Yuan, Zusanli, Fenglong, Liang Qiu 2 spleen Shu. Weishu, Shenshu, Shangjuxu, Xia Juxu. Alternate selection of acupoints for 3 weeks embedding thread once for 12 weeks. Clinical observation for 12 weeks, recorded the patient's age, height, weight, waist circumference, thigh circumference. Glucose tolerance test, insulin release test, serum lipids and IL-6 TNF- 伪 SODX ox-LDL Elisa assay; The results of the experiment were analyzed by statistical software, and the mechanism of curative effect was discussed. Results: 1. The average body weight of the control group and the treatment group decreased by 2.2 kg and 7 kg, respectively, and the BMI decreased by 0.65 and 2.7 kg, respectively. The waist circumference and hip circumference decreased by 3.2 cm and 5.5 cm, respectively, and the hip circumference decreased by 5.6 cm and 7.8 cm, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). There was significant difference between the two groups after treatment and baseline level (P 0.01). 2. There was no significant difference between CHOL and baseline before and after treatment in the two groups (P 0.05). The increase of HDL-C in the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05), but there was no statistical significance between the two groups (P 0. 05. 3. 1hINS decreased significantly (P 0. 01)). The decrease of 3hins in OhINS was significantly lower than that of P0.05; There was no significant difference in 3hins between the groups of OhINS 1hINS 2hINS and 3hINS. The HOMA-IRISI of the two groups was significantly improved (P 0.01), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of HOMA- 尾. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. The level of IL-6 TNF- 伪 in the two groups was significantly lower than that in the control group and SOD was significantly increased (P0.01). The expression of microRNA-29 was down-regulated in both groups, and the down-regulation was statistically significant (P 0.05). The down-regulation level in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P 0.05) .7.mir-29 was positively correlated with BMIHOMA-IR. 8. In the course of the experiment, the safety indexes such as liver and kidney function and blood routine were not obviously abnormal in the two groups. Conclusion: in the random trial, the patients with overweight and obesity have significant weight loss, the effect of reducing waist circumference, the regulation of blood lipid, and the improvement of insulin resistance. Increase insulin sensitivity and improve the low inflammatory response and oxidative stress caused by obesity: inhibit the expression of mir-29; There was no obvious adverse reaction.
【学位授予单位】:成都中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R246.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 魏素红;杨建宇;李彦知;史金花;戴淑琴;;关于微创穴位埋线技术规范的思考[J];中国医药指南;2007年S1期

2 张幼慈;;中医穴位埋线减肥324例疗效分析[J];中外医疗;2008年36期

3 左芳;楼婷;;穴位埋线的临床应用状况和发展趋势研究[J];中华中医药学刊;2009年05期

4 黄洪波;李东;;穴位埋线临床与基础研究概况[J];河北中医;2010年05期

5 李玉敏;张晓杰;;穴位埋线法治疗痤疮的临床研究进展[J];甘肃中医学院学报;2010年05期

6 黄健;毛胜富;;穴位埋线抑制生殖器疱疹复发疗效观察[J];中国针灸;2010年10期

7 雷景和;;无创穴位埋线减肥疗法的临床应用[J];甘肃医药;2011年03期

8 刘进;;穴位埋线减肥52例疗效观察[J];中医临床研究;2013年01期

9 顾亚娇;赵文霞;;穴位埋线对非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者血脂影响观察40例[J];中国中医药现代远程教育;2013年19期

10 陆健;葛堂;赵敬阳;;穴位埋线麻醉试验过程和首例成功的汇报[J];天津医药;1976年09期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 刘颖;;穴位埋线法在中医外科中的应用[A];2008年中医外科学术年会论文集[C];2008年

2 任晓艳;;穴位埋线拓展及临床应用[A];农村中医药适宜技术交流及推广研讨会论文集[C];2006年

3 张幼慈;;中医穴位埋线减肥324例疗效分析[A];第二十四届航天医学年会暨第七届航天护理年会论文汇编[C];2008年

4 黄宁霞;钟彦;;穴位埋线对预防化疗呕吐的疗效观察[A];中华中医药学会第八次外治学术会议论文集[C];2012年

5 刘晓琴;温转;;浅谈穴位埋线后不同疾病出现的典型反应[A];全国针灸临床适宜技术推广研讨会暨甘肃省针灸学会2013年学术年会论文集[C];2013年

6 雷景和;;无创穴位埋线减肥疗法的临床应用[A];甘肃省中医药学会2010年会员代表大会暨学术年会论文汇编[C];2010年

7 张中成;骆悠;;电针结合穴位埋线对代谢综合征患者胰岛素抵抗的影响[A];广东省针灸学会第十一次学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2010年

8 任晓艳;徐松波;;穴位埋线减肥法治疗肥胖症1260例疗效观察[A];中国针灸学会第六届全国中青年针灸推拿学术交流暨针灸学科发展与建设研讨会论文汇编[C];2004年

9 张理梅;;穴位埋线在损美性皮肤病中的应用[A];浙江省中医药学会2005年外科、耳鼻喉科学术交流会资料汇编[C];2005年

10 姚军;陈炜;;穴位埋线瘦身及减肥174例[A];全国第16届针灸临床学术研讨会、全国第11届耳穴诊治学术研讨会、当代临床治验论坛暨中西部十省区学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 天津中医药大学第一附属医院主治医师 尹丽丽;穴位埋线进展多[N];健康报;2007年

2 邢郦阳;穴位埋线治肥胖[N];家庭医生报;2008年

3 中南大学湘雅二医院针灸科 雷毅军 吴杞;穴位埋线可减肥[N];家庭医生报;2004年

4 ;穴位埋线治癫痫[N];中国中医药报;2009年

5 yび板逭步,

本文编号:1405473


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongyixuelunwen/1405473.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a7e13***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com