穴位埋线配合耳穴压豆对单纯性肥胖症(肝郁气滞型)临床疗效观察
本文关键词: 穴位埋线 耳穴压豆 单纯性肥胖症 肝郁气滞型 出处:《山东中医药大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:目的:观察穴位埋线配合耳穴压豆治疗肝郁气滞型单纯性肥胖症的临床疗效,并观察与单纯穴位埋线间是否存在差异。方法:选取符合纳入标准的60例患者,按数字随机法分为观察组、对照组,各30例。通过组内比较和组间比较,观察两个疗程后两组观察指标的变化情况。结果:1.组内比较:两组患者治疗后体重、体重指数、肌肉率、身体脂肪率、腰围、臀围、症状积分与治疗前相比,改善明显,有非常显著性差异(P㩳0.01);胸围治疗前后无显著性差异(P㧐0.05)。2.组间比较:两组间在体重、体重指数、肌肉率、身体脂肪率、三围方面分别于治疗前、治疗后进行对比,均无显著性差异(P㧐0.05)。治疗后,观察组临床症状积分明显低于对照组,有显著性差异(p㩳0.05),观察组优于对照组。结论:两种治疗方法对肝郁气滞型单纯性肥胖症均有较好疗效,配合耳穴压豆在改善临床症状方面优于单纯穴位埋线。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the clinical effect of catgut embedding at acupoint combined with acupoint pressing on simple obesity with stagnation of liver and qi, and to observe whether there is a difference between catgut embedding at acupoint and simple acupoint. Methods: 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: observation group (n = 30), control group (n = 30) and control group (n = 30). The changes of observation indexes after two courses of treatment were observed. Results: comparison: body weight, body mass index (BMI), body mass index (BMI) after treatment were compared between two groups. Muscle rate, body fat rate, waist circumference, hip circumference, symptom score were significantly improved compared with before treatment. There was no significant difference in chest circumference before and after treatment. Comparison between two groups: there was no significant difference between the two groups in body weight, body mass index, muscle rate, body fat rate and tri-circumference before and after treatment. After treatment, the clinical symptom score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: the two treatment methods have better effect on simple obesity with stagnation of liver and qi, and the combination of auricular acupoint pressing bean is superior to simple catgut embedding in improving clinical symptoms.
【学位授予单位】:山东中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R246.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 叶莉;封飞虎;李春艳;扈盛;盛一帆;朱炎锋;;运动减肥夏令营对男性肥胖青少年体成分及血清生化指标的影响[J];中国康复理论与实践;2016年02期
2 杨硕;陈波;陈盼碧;吴高鑫;路绍祖;刘莉;;不同层次简易穴位埋线对单纯性肥胖的短期影响[J];辽宁中医杂志;2016年02期
3 黄振;宋双临;谭克平;楚佳梅;诸晓英;曾友华;;穴位埋线治疗肝郁脾虚型非酒精性脂肪性肝病:随机对照研究[J];中国针灸;2016年02期
4 王宏亮;张珉;张俊钰;钟武;;治疗肥胖症药——利拉鲁肽[J];临床药物治疗杂志;2016年01期
5 闫润虎;白洁;顾劲松;于江;李雪飞;隋静;;穴位埋线对肥胖大鼠SOCS-3基因表达的影响[J];中华中医药学刊;2016年01期
6 周蕾;傅晓骏;张永姣;贾素庆;钱璐;;穴位埋线加西药治疗代谢综合征腹型肥胖的临床研究[J];中华中医药学刊;2016年01期
7 温月贤;黄源鹏;;耳穴贴压治疗产后肥胖症31例临床观察[J];云南中医中药杂志;2015年12期
8 杨茜;陈和军;陈富宾;;穴位埋线治疗脾虚湿阻型肥胖症临床观察[J];新疆中医药;2015年06期
9 郁文平;白冰;;脂肪因子与肥胖相关心血管疾病关系的研究进展[J];心脏杂志;2016年03期
10 黄伟;韦丹;杨天颖;颜晓蓉;周仲瑜;;穴位埋线结合饮食运动治疗单纯性肥胖临床疗效观察[J];针灸临床杂志;2015年10期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 熊昌云;普洱茶降脂减肥功效及作用机理研究[D];浙江大学;2012年
2 郭人Z,
本文编号:1521484
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongyixuelunwen/1521484.html