女性生理周期中医指导原则的拟定与评价

发布时间：2018-04-17 16:26

本文选题：女性生理周期 + 维护　；参考：《广东医学》2017年11期

【摘要】：目的通过德尔菲专家问卷调查,对女性生理周期的中医指导原则进行拟定与评价。方法在前期文献研究基础上,形成策略池,对中医治未病、中医妇科等领域的专家进行2轮德尔菲法问卷调查,探讨女性生理周期中医指导原则框架及条目。研究对专家积极度、集中程度、协调程度、权威程度进行评价。结果 2轮调查的专家积极系数分别为84.93%与88.71%;权威程度均0.7;专家意见评分平均值中位数分别为9.10与8.68,加权平均值中位数为8.01与7.72,满分率中位数为60.32%与60.38%,2轮调查变异系数最大值均为0.26。结论在调查研究中,专家的积极性和专业水准均较高,可信度较高,专家意见较为集中。通过德尔菲调查的方式,基本确定女性生理周期中医指导原则的研究框架及条目。
[Abstract]:Objective to draw up and evaluate the TCM guiding principles of female physiological cycle by Delphi expert questionnaire.Methods on the basis of the previous literature study, a strategy pool was formed, and two rounds of Delphi questionnaire were conducted among experts in the fields of TCM treatment and gynecology, and the framework and items of TCM guiding principles of female physiological cycle were discussed.The study evaluates the degree of activity, concentration, coordination and authority of experts.Results the positive coefficients of experts in the two rounds were 84.93% and 88.71 respectively, the degree of authority was 0.7.The median of expert opinion score was 9.10 and 8.68, the weighted average was 8.01 and 7.72, and the median of full score was 60.32% and 60.38% respectively.The maximum values of different coefficients were 0.26.Conclusion in the investigation and research, the enthusiasm and professional level of the experts are higher, the credibility is higher, and the experts' opinions are more concentrated.Through Delphi investigation, the research framework and items of TCM guiding principles of female physiological cycle are basically determined.
【作者单位】：广东省中医院广州中医药大学第二附属医院广东省中医药科学院治未病中心;广州中医药大学博士后科研流动站;广州中医药大学第二临床医学院;
【基金】：2014年中医药部门公共卫生服务补助资金中医药标准制修订项目(编号:SATCM-2015-BZ[379])
【分类号】：R271

【相似文献】