穴位埋线结合普通针刺治疗痤疮:一项临床随机对照试验

发布时间：2018-05-04 11:09

本文选题：穴位埋线 + 针刺　；参考：《中华中医药杂志》2017年08期

【摘要】：目的:比较穴位埋线结合普通针刺与口服异维A酸胶囊治疗痤疮的疗效差异。方法:将95例痤疮患者按照随机数字表法分为治疗组(47例)和对照组(48例)。治疗组采用穴位埋线结合普通针刺,埋线每周1次,普通针刺隔日1次,连续8周;对照组采用口服异维A酸胶囊,1日2次,10mg/次,连续8周。治疗后比较两组Pill Sburv及国际改良痤疮分级法诊断分级及总有效率。记录不良反应发生情况。随访3个月比较复发率情况。结果:诊断分级方面,两组均较治疗前有改善(P0.05),但治疗后两组之间差异无统计学意义。治疗组有效率93.62%,对照组为85.42%,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。相较于针灸疗法,口服西药不良事件发生概率更高。复发率方面,治疗组为23.81%,对照组为18.75%,两者差异无统计学意义。结论:穴位埋线结合普通针刺治疗痤疮安全有效,不良反应少。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the curative effect of acupoint catgut embedding combined with common acupuncture and oral isoretinoic acid capsule in the treatment of acne. Methods: 95 patients with acne were randomly divided into treatment group (n = 47) and control group (n = 48). The treatment group was treated with acupoint catgut embedding combined with common acupuncture once a week, and the control group was treated with isotinic acid capsule twice a day for 8 weeks, while the control group was treated with isotinic acid capsules twice a day for 8 weeks. After treatment, Pill Sburv and international modified acne grading were compared in diagnosis and total effective rate. Adverse reactions were recorded. The recurrence rate was compared after 3 months follow-up. Results: the diagnostic grading of the two groups was better than that before treatment (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups after treatment. The effective rate was 93.62 in the treatment group and 85.42 in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The incidence of adverse events in oral western medicine is higher than that in acupuncture therapy. The recurrence rate was 23.81 in the treatment group and 18.75 in the control group. Conclusion: acupoint catgut embedding combined with common acupuncture is safe and effective in the treatment of acne.
【作者单位】：广州中医药大学针灸康复临床医学院;
【基金】：国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(No.2012CB518504)~~
【分类号】：R246.7

【参考文献】