当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 中医论文 >

刺络拔罐治疗乳腺癌术后上肢水肿的临床疗效观察

发布时间:2018-06-26 20:51

  本文选题:刺络拔罐 + 临床治疗 ; 参考:《北京中医药大学》2016年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的客观评价刺络拔罐治疗乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿的临床疗效,为乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿患者提供一个方便可靠的中医治疗方案,为刺络拔罐治疗乳腺癌术后上肢水肿的规范化操作提供技术支持。方法将75例乳腺癌术后上肢水肿患者随机分为两组,其中对照组25例,治疗组50例;治疗组给予刺络拔罐,同时行上肢功能锻炼操,刺络拔罐的部位选择为患侧上肢手三阴经和手三阳经,每次治疗选取1-2条经络,沿此经络在皮下结节处、最肿胀部位梅花针点刺出血后拔火罐;同时循背部双侧膀胱经闪罐两遍后,选取肺俞穴及脾俞穴点刺出血后拔火罐,沿膀胱经其它部位仅拔罐不点刺出血,每个部位留罐10分钟;对照组单纯行上肢功能锻炼操。两组治疗周期均为50天,上肢功能锻炼操每天进行,每次30分钟,治疗组刺络拔罐5天行一次治疗,共进行10次治疗。主要疗效评价指标为患肢臂围变化,5次访视分别记录患侧上肢腕横纹、腕上lOcm、肘横纹、肘上l0cm处的臂围,将两组治疗前后的臂围平均值及差值进行分析对比;次要疗效评价指标包括有效指数、肩关节活动度、疼痛评分、患肢肌力分级、生活质量评分及安全性评价。所有研究数据及结果均采用SPSS20.0统计软件进行计算分析,若P0.05则认为差异有统计学意义。结果通过50天的临床疗效观察,治疗后两组臂围的均值及差值P0.05,差异具有统计学意义,其中治疗组臂围平均减小1.21cm,对照组臂围平均减小0.58cm,治疗组的疗效明显优于对照组;患肢腕横纹处及腕横纹上l0cm处,组间比较其均值及差值具有统计学意义,治疗组在此两点处的臂围缩小较对照组明显;治疗组与对照组的总有效率分别为95.8%和58.3%;在改善肩关节功能活动方面,组间比较P0.05,两组之间无差异;但是两组治疗前后的组内比较,四个角度的活动均有所改善,差异具有统计学意义;在改善疼痛方面,组内比较P0.05,两组患者治疗后疼痛均较治疗前减轻,组间比较P0.05,治疗组优于对照组;在生活质量方面,比较治疗组与对照组治疗后QOL总分,得出P0.05,差异具有统计学意义,说明在提高患者生活质量方面,治疗组明显优于对照组,而生活质量的提高具体表现在“改善睡眠”、“缓解疲乏”“减轻疼痛”三个方面;安全评价方面,两组患者均未出现不良事件。结论刺络拔罐法可有效减轻患肢水肿,尤其对前臂水肿的消退有较突出的疗效;刺络拔罐可以改善肩关节活动度,能更有效的缓解上肢淋巴水肿所引起的肢体疼痛,同时可以改善睡眠,缓解疲乏从而提高乳腺癌术后上肢水肿患者的生活质量,并且刺络拔罐法操作简便、费用低廉、安全性高,易于被患者接受,是一种值得在临床上推广应用的治疗乳腺癌术后上肢水肿的可靠方案。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate objectively the clinical effect of pricking and cupping on upper limb lymphedema after operation of breast cancer, and to provide a convenient and reliable Chinese medicine treatment scheme for postoperative lymphedema patients of breast cancer. To provide technical support for standardized operation of pricking and cupping for upper limb edema after breast cancer operation. Methods Seventy-five patients with upper limb edema after breast cancer operation were randomly divided into two groups: the control group (n = 25) and the treatment group (n = 50). The position of pricking and cupping was selected as three yin meridians and three yang meridians of the affected upper limbs. 1-2 meridians were selected for each treatment, along which the meridians were placed at the subcutaneous nodule, and the most swollen part was pricked with plum needle to prick the cupping. At the same time, the cupping of both sides of the bladder was followed twice, and the cupping was taken out after pricking and bleeding at the points of Feshu and Peshu, and only the cupping was not punctured along the other parts of the bladder, and the cupping was kept in each part for 10 minutes, while in the control group, the function of upper limbs was exercised only. The treatment period of the two groups was 50 days. The upper limb functional exercise was performed every day for 30 minutes. The treatment group was treated once for 5 days and 10 times. The main outcome indexes were as follows: the changes of arm circumference of the affected limbs were recorded by 5 visits. The transverse striae of wrist, lOcm on wrist, transverse striae of elbow and arm circumference of l0cm on elbow were recorded respectively. The mean value and difference of arm circumference before and after treatment were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Secondary efficacy indicators included effectiveness index, shoulder motion, pain score, muscle strength grading of affected limbs, quality of life score and safety evaluation. All the data and results were calculated and analyzed by SPSS 20.0 statistical software. If P0.05, the difference was statistically significant. Results after 50 days of treatment, the mean value and difference of arm circumference were significantly different between the two groups (P 0.05). The average arm circumference of the treatment group decreased 1.21 cm, and the average arm circumference of the control group decreased 0.58 cm. The curative effect of the treatment group was significantly better than that of the control group. The mean value and difference between the two groups were statistically significant, and the total effective rates of the treatment group and the control group were 95.8% and 58.3%, respectively, and the reduction of the arm circumference between the two groups was more obvious than that in the control group, and the total effective rates of the treatment group and the control group were 95.8% and 58.3%, respectively. In terms of improving the functional activity of shoulder joint, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of P0.05, but the activity of four angles was improved in both groups before and after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant. Compared with P0.05, the pain of the two groups after treatment was less than that before treatment, the comparison between the two groups was P0.05, the treatment group was better than the control group, in terms of quality of life, the total score of QOL after treatment was compared between the treatment group and the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. It shows that the treatment group is obviously superior to the control group in improving the quality of life of the patients, and the improvement of the quality of life is manifested in three aspects: "improving sleep", "relieving fatigue" and "relieving pain"; There were no adverse events in both groups. Conclusion the method of pricking and cupping can effectively reduce the edema of the affected limb, especially the abatement of the edema of the forearm, and the pricking and cupping can improve the motion of the shoulder joint and relieve the limb pain caused by lymphedema of the upper limb more effectively. At the same time, it can improve sleep, relieve fatigue and improve the quality of life of patients with edema of upper extremity after breast cancer operation, and the method of puncture and cupping is easy to operate, low cost, high safety and easy to be accepted by patients. It is a reliable method for the treatment of upper limb edema after breast cancer surgery.
【学位授予单位】:北京中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R246.5

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 杨冬梅,郭玉红;50例周围性面神经麻痹病人行刺络拔罐治疗的观察及护理[J];护理研究;2005年06期

2 任珊;;刺络拔罐治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛的临床研究[J];河南中医学院学报;2009年01期

3 陈鹏飞;郑崇勇;;电针加刺络拔罐治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛临床观察[J];现代临床医学;2010年01期

4 戴杰;阴爱华;周鹰;;经络电信息诊疗法配合刺络拔罐治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛30例[J];中国中医基础医学杂志;2011年05期

5 刘斌;;电针加刺络拔罐治疗腰椎间盘突出症61例[J];山西中医;2012年09期

6 夏艳民,乌云娜,秦岭,张永祥;刺络拔罐治疗咳嗽156例疗效观察[J];针灸临床杂志;1998年05期

7 朱美钰;刺络拔罐治疗带状疱疹108例[J];上海针灸杂志;2001年02期

8 冯伟民;刺络拔罐治疗软组织损伤156例即刻与远期止痛效果观察[J];中国中医药科技;2004年03期

9 康红千,李萌;刺络拔罐治疗丹毒48例疗效观察[J];中国中医急症;2005年01期

10 古恩鹏;李瓦里;;刺络拔罐治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床体会[J];天津中医药;2006年03期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 高明;;刺络拔罐治疗痤疮275例[A];2011年全国中医美容学术年会暨贵州省医学美学与美容学、激光医学分会学术年会论文集[C];2011年

2 田楠;陶晓雁;周宇;;刺络拔罐治疗痤疮临床研究概况[A];2011中国针灸学会年会论文集(摘要)[C];2011年

3 黄桂兴;金国利;黄一鸣;;电针脐周八穴加刺络拔罐治疗痤疮[A];浙江省针灸学会第五次会员代表大会学术论文汇编[C];2008年

4 古恩鹏;李瓦里;;刺络拔罐治疗腰间盘突出症的临床体会[A];全国首届刺络放血研究及临床学术交流会论文集[C];2003年

5 回克义;;刺络拔罐治疗带状疱疹疗效观察[A];全国第16届针灸临床学术研讨会、全国第11届耳穴诊治学术研讨会、当代临床治验论坛暨中西部十省区学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年

6 徐田;周莅莅;崔岚;;刺络拔罐治疗手部顽固性湿疹38例[A];“针灸诊疗规范化研究的思路”学术论文集[C];2008年

7 金孟梓;谢作群;陈先威;陈德秀;陈德沛;;刺络拔罐治疗中老年带状疱疹疗效观察[A];中国针灸学会2009学术年会论文集(下集)[C];2009年

8 周定伟;温木生;;皮下针、点灸及刺络拔罐治疗带状疱疹[A];重庆市针灸学会2010年学术年会论文集[C];2010年

9 徐舰;;刺络拔罐治疗带状疱疹的疗效[A];2002中国中西医结合皮肤性病学术会议论文汇编[C];2002年

10 王为;;针灸加刺络拔罐治疗面瘫36例临床观察[A];二○○九年重庆市针灸学会学术年会论文集[C];2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 张艳冉;刺络拔罐治疗乳腺癌术后上肢水肿的临床疗效观察[D];北京中医药大学;2016年

2 张喜娟;刺络拔罐治疗血瘀型腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效及对血液流变学的影响[D];福建中医学院;2008年

3 赵娜;刺络拔罐治疗慢性荨麻疹的临床研究[D];湖南中医药大学;2013年

4 欧俊男;体针配合刺络拔罐治疗湿热蕴结型痤疮的临床研究[D];广州中医药大学;2015年

5 于向艳;刺络拔罐治疗慢性持续期支气管哮喘的临床研究[D];河北医科大学;2008年

6 姜海威;膈俞刺络拔罐治疗偏头痛临床研究[D];长春中医药大学;2014年



本文编号:2071371

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongyixuelunwen/2071371.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4fd5d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com