当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 中医论文 >

金水复元方治疗肺肾阴虚型癌因性疲乏的临床研究

发布时间:2018-11-24 19:32
【摘要】:目的:通过对癌因性疲乏患者进行研究,观察金水复元方治疗肺肾阴虚型癌因性疲乏的临床疗效及安全性。方法:从本院肿瘤科选取66例符合纳入标准的试验对象,并将其按照1:1的比例随机分为两组(对照组和治疗组)。采用前瞻性随机对照法进行研究,对照组仅予基础治疗,治疗组在基础治疗的基础上加予金水复元方(熟地黄30g、当归15g、茯苓10昏姜半夏9g、陈皮10g、甘草10g、焦神曲10g、焦麦芽10g、焦山楂10g)口服,观察周期14天,以两组治疗前后的中医证候积分、Piper疲乏量表评分、功能状态评分(KPS评分)等为疗效观察指标,来判定患者治疗后疲乏的缓解率及体力状况的改善情况,以血常规、肝肾功能、心电图为安全性观测指标,评价金水复元方治疗肺肾阴虚型癌因性疲乏的近期疗效及其安全性。结果:研究共纳入试验对象66例,其中两组各有30例完成临床试验。在治疗开始前,分别对两组患者的性别组成、年龄分布、癌种、体重、功能状态评分(KPS评分)、中医证候积分、Piper疲乏量表总得分及行为疲乏、情感疲乏、感知疲乏和认知疲乏等方面进行统计分析,P值均0.05,分组成立,可进行研究。以两组治疗前后中医证候积分作为疗效评价标准,治疗组30例有效率为96.66%,对照组30例有效率23.33%,P0.01,差异有显著统计学意义。比较两组治疗前后疲乏量表总分、行为疲乏评分、情感疲乏评分、感知疲乏评分及认知疲乏评分,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),比较两组疲乏量表总分、行为疲乏评分、情感疲乏评分、感知疲乏评分及认知疲乏评分治疗前后差值(治疗前-治疗后),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗组KPS评分治疗前后组内比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05),对照组KPS评分治疗前后组内比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),治疗后两组KPS评分组间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),说明金水复元方对本研究中患者治疗前后KPS评分无明显影响。治疗组体重治疗前后组内比较差异有显著统计学意义(P0.01),对照组体重治疗前后组内比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),治疗后两组患者体重组间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),两组患者体重治疗前后差值(治疗后-治疗前)比较,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组试验对象安全性指标通过治疗前后组间比较、组内比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:金水复元方可有效改善肺肾阴虚型癌因性疲乏患者的疲乏症状,降低患者Piper疲乏量表评分,使患者生活质量得到提高,该方安全有效,无明显不良反应,值得临床推广。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the clinical efficacy and safety of Jinshui Fuyuan recipe in treating lung and kidney yin deficiency cancer related fatigue. Methods: 66 subjects were selected from oncology department of our hospital and randomly divided into two groups (control group and treatment group) according to the proportion of 1:1. A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. The control group was treated only with basic treatment. The treatment group was treated with Jinshui Fuyuan recipe (30 g of Rehmannia glutinosa, 15 g of Angelica sinensis, 9 g of Poria cocos 10 faint ginger, 10 g of orange peel, 10 g of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, 10 g of Jiaoshenqu), and 10 g of Jiaoshenqu, respectively. 10g of pyromalt and 10g of Hawthorn were taken orally. The observation period was 14 days. The scores of TCM syndromes, Piper fatigue scale and functional state score (KPS) before and after treatment were taken as therapeutic indexes. To determine the relief rate of fatigue and the improvement of physical condition after treatment, taking blood routine, liver and kidney function and electrocardiogram as the safety observation index, to evaluate the short-term curative effect and safety of Jinshui Fuyuan prescription in the treatment of lung and kidney yin deficiency cancer due to fatigue. Results: 66 subjects were included in the study, including 30 cases in each group. Before treatment, the sex composition, age distribution, cancer type, weight, functional status score (KPS score), TCM syndrome score, total score of Piper fatigue scale, behavioral fatigue, emotional fatigue were measured. Perceptual fatigue and cognitive fatigue were statistically analyzed, P values were 0.05, which could be studied in groups. The effective rate of 30 cases in the treatment group was 96.66 and that in the control group was 23.33g / 0.01, the difference was statistically significant. The total score, behavioral fatigue score, emotional fatigue score, perceptual fatigue score and cognitive fatigue score of the two groups before and after treatment were significantly different (P0.05), the total score of fatigue scale and the score of behavioral fatigue were compared between the two groups. Emotional fatigue score, perceived fatigue score and cognitive fatigue score before and after treatment difference (pre-treatment-after treatment), the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). There was no significant difference in KPS score before and after treatment in the treatment group (P0.05), but there was no significant difference in the KPS score in the control group before and after treatment (P0.05). There was no significant difference in KPS score between the two groups after treatment (P0.05), indicating that Jinshui Fuyuan recipe had no significant effect on KPS score before and after treatment. There was significant difference between the treatment group and the control group before and after treatment (P0.01), while the comparison between the control group and the control group was statistically significant (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups after treatment (P0.05), the difference between the two groups before and after treatment (after treatment-before treatment), the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The safety indexes of the two groups were compared before and after treatment, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion: Jinshui Fuyuan prescription can effectively improve the fatigue symptoms of patients with lung and kidney yin deficiency type cancer fatigue, reduce the score of Piper fatigue scale, and improve the quality of life of the patients. The prescription is safe and effective, without obvious adverse reactions, and is worth popularizing in clinical practice.
【学位授予单位】:北京中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R273

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李铮;;癌因性疲乏的概念分析及其护理措施[J];护理学杂志;2006年03期

2 黄彩辉;钱耀荣;姚晚侠;;癌因性疲乏初探[J];现代肿瘤医学;2006年05期

3 李艳;袁长蓉;徐燕;;癌因性疲乏的相关因素及其机制[J];解放军护理杂志;2008年09期

4 李艳;徐燕;袁长蓉;;癌因性疲乏干预措施的研究进展[J];护理研究;2008年28期

5 梁骊敏;张美芬;张俊娥;;肺癌术后化疗患者癌因性疲乏调查分析[J];护理学杂志;2009年04期

6 李艳;袁长蓉;;癌因性疲乏管理中的障碍与对策[J];护士进修杂志;2010年01期

7 薛广伟;;乳腺癌患者癌因性疲乏干预措施的研究进展[J];中国临床研究;2010年05期

8 高青;;癌因性疲乏的相关因素分析与护理对策[J];护理实践与研究;2011年01期

9 王婷;赵江;张淼;李成;王维利;;癌症患者癌因性疲乏干预策略的研究现状与展望[J];护理学报;2011年07期

10 宁泽;;80例癌因性疲乏患者的健康教育效果观察与体会[J];当代医学;2011年13期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 刘爱琴;;癌因性疲乏的现状及护理进展[A];中华护理学会全国肿瘤护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2010年

2 钱莉;庞冬;路潜;;癌症患者化疗期间癌因性疲乏及其相关因素的调查与分析[A];全国肿瘤护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2004年

3 李珍;孙萌;豆艳;;癌因性疲乏患者的护理[A];肿瘤研究新进展学术会议论文集[C];2008年

4 王丁兰;;癌因性疲乏初探[A];中华护理学会全国肿瘤护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2009年

5 张翠莲;;癌因性疲乏护理干预措施的研究进展[A];全国中西医结合血液学学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年

6 李兰生;马俊婷;;有效护理干预对癌因性疲乏病人的作用[A];中华护理学会全国肿瘤护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2010年

7 王爱梅;李浮;;癌因性疲乏的护理现状及展望[A];中华护理学会全国肿瘤护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2010年

8 张翠莲;;癌因性疲乏护理干预措施的研究进展[A];全国第13届老年护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议、全国中医、中西医结合护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2010年

9 王丁兰;;癌因性疲乏粗探[A];全国中医、中西医护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2008年

10 谭佳丽;边志衡;;癌因性疲乏的护理干预[A];全国肿瘤护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2008年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 连炜铃;癌因性疲乏中医辨证及针灸治疗的临床研究[D];广州中医药大学;2015年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 张龙;恶性肿瘤术后患者癌因性疲乏与生存质量的相关性研究[D];延边大学;2015年

2 何明珠;肿瘤化疗患者癌因性疲乏状况及其影响因素的研究[D];石河子大学;2015年

3 丁金霞;自我管理对化疗期胃癌患者癌因性疲乏的干预效果研究[D];安徽医科大学;2015年

4 张涛;癌因性疲乏中医证型的临床研究[D];安徽中医药大学;2015年

5 卢会琴;复方守宫散治疗癌因性疲乏的临床研究[D];安徽中医药大学;2015年

6 王海明;消化系统肿瘤患者癌因性疲乏综合干预疗效及血清代谢物分析[D];第二军医大学;2015年

7 王玉杰;PICC置管癌症患者癌因性疲乏及心理社会影响因素[D];山东大学;2015年

8 邹凌云;不同持续时间的振荡运动对雌鼠乳腺癌癌因性疲乏的影响[D];辽宁医学院;2015年

9 吉晶;十全大补汤加减治疗癌因性疲乏的临床研究[D];山东中医药大学;2015年

10 徐竞男;消化道肿瘤癌因性疲乏临床特征分析及益气健脾补肾方干预作用观察[D];北京中医药大学;2016年



本文编号:2354781

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongyixuelunwen/2354781.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c6620***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com