快刺法治疗颈型颈椎病的临床观察

发布时间：2018-12-10 15:56

【摘要】：目的:本研究通过对颈型颈椎病(Cervical Type of Cervical Spondylosis)患者分别进行快刺不留针法、常规普通针刺法治疗,观察快刺不留针法对颈型颈椎病患者的治疗效果。方法:60名颈型颈椎病患者,随机分为两组,即快刺不留针组和常规普通针刺组,每组各30例;观察两组治疗前后Northwick Park颈痛量表(NPQ)以及简式McGill疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)评分的变化,并观察临床表现及不良反应,评价其疗效。结果:治疗前,刺不留针组和常规普通针刺组两组组间比较差异无显著性意义(P0.05);治疗后,两组NPQ积分与治疗前相比均有显著性意义(P0.05),且快刺不留针组优于普通针刺组(P0.05);两组的SF-MPQ各项评分均明显改善,且快刺不留针组在感觉PRI、总PRI方面优于普通针刺组(P0.05)。结论:快刺不留针法可有效治疗颈型颈椎病,明显改善颈型颈椎病临床症状,在改善疼痛和负面情绪方面优于普通针刺组,可以作为治疗颈型颈椎病的一种有效方法。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the effect of rapid acupuncture without acupuncture and conventional acupuncture on cervical spondylosis (Cervical Type of Cervical Spondylosis). Methods: sixty patients with cervical spondylopathy were randomly divided into two groups: fast acupuncture group (30 cases) and routine acupuncture group (30 cases). The changes of Northwick Park cervical pain scale (NPQ) and simple McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) before and after treatment were observed. The clinical manifestations and adverse reactions were observed and the curative effect was evaluated. Results: before treatment, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). After treatment, the NPQ scores of the two groups were significantly higher than those before treatment (P0.05), and the fast needling group was better than the common acupuncture group (P0.05). The scores of SF-MPQ in both groups were significantly improved, and the total PRI of sensory PRI, in the fast needling group was better than that in the common acupuncture group (P0.05). Conclusion: fast acupuncture without acupuncture can effectively treat cervical spondylosis and improve the clinical symptoms of cervical spondylosis. It is superior to the common acupuncture group in improving pain and negative emotion. It can be used as an effective method for the treatment of cervical spondylosis.
【学位授予单位】：山东中医药大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：R246.9

【参考文献】