香槟方对腰椎融合术后胃肠功能影响的临床研究
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the changes of abdominal distension pain, bowel sound, anal exhaust and defecation, nausea and vomiting in patients after lumbar vertebrae operation on the basis of animal experiment of Champagne Fang. To clarify the effect of Champagne recipe on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after lumbar vertebra operation, to give full play to the characteristics and advantages of traditional Chinese medicine in the perioperative period of lumbar vertebrae, and to lay a foundation for the study of rapid rehabilitation of patients after spinal surgery. Methods: sixty patients with single and double segmental lumbar fusion in Guangdong traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were randomly divided into two groups: experimental group (n = 30) and control group (n = 30). Abdominal pain and abdominal distension were recorded one day before operation. On the first day after operation, the two groups were given drugs. On the basis of routine treatment, the experimental group was treated with Champagne prescription (areca nut 10g, ginseng 9g, black medicine 10g, Amomum villosum 6g, peach kernel 10g). The control group was given placebo until 7 days after operation. Take one dose a day at 9: 00 in the morning and 16:00 in the afternoon. At 6 hours (17: 00-1: 00), on the first day (1: 00-9: 00), on the first day (9: 00-17: 00), on the first day (17: 00-1: 00), on the second day (1: 00-9: 00), The second day (9: 00-17: 00), the second day (17: 00-1: 00), the third day, the fourth day, the fifth day, the sixth day and the seventh day after the operation were recorded. The first exsufflation of anus and the time of first defecation after operation were recorded. The changes of gastrointestinal tract such as abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting were recorded, and the data were established by using the perioperative gastrointestinal function evaluation scale. The data were processed by statistical SPSS13.0 data software. Results: 1. The average recovery time of postoperative bowel sounds was 17.99 h and 25.12 h, respectively, the difference was statistically significant (p0. 000 / p0.01); 2. The mean of the first time after operation was 16.87 h and 20.42 h, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p0.049, p0.05). The mean of the first defecation time was 60.26 h and 75.7 h, respectively, the difference was statistically significant (p0. 002 / p0.01); 4. According to the evaluation scale of postoperative gastrointestinal function in perioperative period, the average scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group from the first day (9: 00: 17: 00) to the 7th day after operation, and the difference was statistically significant. That is, p0.01. In the experimental group, the average score of the experimental group in the first day (9: 00: 00), (17: 00 1: 00) and the second day after operation (1: 00-9: 00) was between 6079 and 6079. The average score of the control group was lower than that of the control group, and the average score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.01). On the second day after operation (9: 00 17: 00), the average score of the experimental group was higher than 80 points, while the average score of the control group was still lower than 60 points. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P0.01). From the second day after operation (17: 00 1: 00) to the fourth day after operation, the average score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the control group was still lower than 60 points. The difference between the two groups was significant (P0.01). On the 5th day after operation, the average score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, the average score of the experimental group was more than 90 points, and the average score of the control group was between 600.79. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.01). On the 6th day after operation, the average score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, the average score of the experimental group was more than 90 points, and the average score of the control group was higher than 80 points, the difference was statistically significant (P0.01). There were no adverse events such as headache, dizziness, rash and so on. Conclusion: Champagne prescription can promote the recovery of bowel sound and the time of anal exhaust and defecation in patients with lumbar fusion. The overall clinical effect is good and worth popularizing.
【学位授予单位】:广州中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R274.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 丁宇;腰椎融合术[J];中国矫形外科杂志;2001年10期
2 姜晓幸,陈统一,张光健;腹腔镜下腰椎融合术[J];中华骨科杂志;2002年02期
3 郭炯炯,唐天驷;微创腰椎融合术[J];国外医学.骨科学分册;2003年06期
4 谭俊铭;叶晓健;贾连顺;李家顺;;腰椎融合术的研究进展[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;2006年05期
5 彭宝淦;;腰椎融合术治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛[J];颈腰痛杂志;2006年06期
6 郑召民;李佛保;;对微创腰椎融合术的认识与思考[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;2009年05期
7 刘彦斌;贺石生;李明;;微创腰椎融合术的研究进展[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;2009年05期
8 秦彦超;马迅;;腰椎融合术及临床研究进展[J];中国现代药物应用;2010年01期
9 王璐璐;陈晓亮;;腰椎融合术的研究进展[J];齐鲁医学杂志;2011年06期
10 曾昭荣;;腰椎狭窄综合症机理的探讨[J];贵阳医学院学报;1982年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 吕宏琳;周跃;;微创腰椎融合术的研究与进展[A];第八届全国脊柱脊髓损伤学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年
2 白剑强;夏群;徐宝山;张继东;苗军;杨强;;腰椎融合术后融合率的评价[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年
3 范顺武;方向前;黄悦;赵凤东;;下腰椎融合术的相关问题[A];2005年浙江省骨科学术会议论文汇编[C];2005年
4 邢丹;马剑雄;王杰;徐桂军;马信龙;宋东辉;;后外侧腰椎融合术应用成骨蛋白-1与同种自体骨的系统评价[A];第17次全国风湿病学学术会议论文集[C];2012年
5 邢丹;马信龙;宋东辉;马剑雄;王杰;徐桂军;;后外侧腰椎融合术中应用成骨蛋白-1与同种自体骨的系统评价[A];天津市生物医学工程学会第三十二届学术年会论文集[C];2012年
6 陈剑;范顺武;;关节突关节螺钉在腰椎融合术中的应用进展[A];2004年浙江省骨科学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
7 陆军;宋东辉;曾宪帆;杨杰;张蔚然;邢丹;;后外侧腰椎融合术应用成骨蛋白-1与同种自体骨的系统评价[A];第二十届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会、第二届中国医师协会中西医结合医师分会骨伤科学术年会、第十九届浙江省中西医结合骨伤科专业委员会学术年会论文汇编[C];2013年
8 任忠明;张远;吴宏飞;;双侧小切口椎旁肌间隙入路在下腰椎融合术中应用[A];浙江省医学会骨科学分会30年庆典暨2011年浙江省骨科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年
9 任忠明;吴宏飞;张远;张玉良;张银华;;双侧小切口椎旁肌间隙入路在下腰椎融合术中应用[A];2012年浙江省骨科学术年会论文集[C];2012年
10 蒋国强;陆继业;卢斌;罗科锋;岳兵;乐增年;王如林;韩成钢;;Dynesys内固定术与腰椎融合术的临床对照研究[A];浙江省医学会骨科学分会30年庆典暨2011年浙江省骨科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 通讯员 张献怀;解放军总医院第一附属医院治疗椎间盘腰痛初显疗效[N];大众科技报;2007年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 王志钢;羊腰椎后路全椎板减压椎弓根钉内固定与否的力学性质研究[D];天津医科大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 付青山;两种椎间植骨融合方式治疗腰椎滑脱的临床疗效的分析[D];安徽医科大学;2016年
2 芮泽野;香槟方对腰椎融合术后胃肠功能影响的临床研究[D];广州中医药大学;2016年
3 郜献雷;改良微创小切口经椎间孔入路腰椎融合术的临床疗效[D];山东大学;2016年
4 唐杰;LLIF与TLIF在临床及影像学上的对比研究[D];重庆医科大学;2016年
5 陶晓锐;仿蛙泳泳姿的锻炼法在腰椎融合术后康复的运用[D];山东大学;2013年
6 林新源;管道下腰椎融合术治疗伴退变失稳的腰椎间盘突出症[D];广州中医药大学;2015年
7 赵椰枫;腰椎融合术后骶髂关节源性下腰痛的诊断和治疗[D];第二军医大学;2008年
8 郑庆丰;Mast Quadrant系统下微创腰椎融合术治疗下腰椎退行性疾病的近期临床研究[D];福建中医药大学;2010年
9 吴寒;后路单节段腰椎融合术中不同冲洗策略对患者围手术期预后影响的评估[D];大连医科大学;2015年
10 周珂;PEEK棒在腰椎融合术中的近期临床研究[D];山东大学;2012年
,本文编号:2383094
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongyixuelunwen/2383094.html