颈椎病患者应用针灸推拿结合中药治疗的疗效及安全性分析

发布时间：2019-04-24 00:48

【摘要】：目的探讨颈椎病患者应用针灸推拿结合中药治疗的疗效及安全性。方法随机选取2013年3月至2016年3月该院收治的颈椎病患者80例,分为2组,即针灸推拿结合中药治疗组(n=40)和针灸推拿治疗组(n=40),比较2组患者的临床疗效、疼痛程度、不良反应发生率及复发情况。结果针灸推拿结合中药治疗组患者治疗的总有效率[90.0%(36/40)]显著高于针灸推拿治疗组[67.5%(27/40)](P0.05),视觉模拟(VAS)评分显著低于针灸推拿治疗组(P0.05),复发率(0)低于针灸推拿治疗组[7.5%(3/40)](P0.05),但2组患者的不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论颈椎病患者应用针灸推拿结合中药治疗的临床疗效较针灸推拿治疗优越,且安全性高,值得临床推广应用。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and massage combined with traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. Methods from March 2013 to March 2016, 80 patients with cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into two groups: acupuncture and massage combined with Chinese medicine treatment group (n = 40), acupuncture and massage group (n = 40) and acupuncture and massage group (n = 40). The clinical efficacy and pain degree of the two groups were compared. Incidence and recurrence of adverse reactions. Results the total effective rate of acupuncture and massage combined with traditional Chinese medicine treatment group [90.0% (36 / 40)] was significantly higher than that of acupuncture and massage treatment group [67.5% (27 / 40)] (P0.05). Visual analogue (VAS) score was significantly lower than acupuncture and massage treatment group (P0.05), recurrence rate (0) was lower than acupuncture and massage treatment group [7.5% (3 / 40)] (P0.05), but the incidence of adverse reactions was compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference (P0.05). Conclusion the clinical curative effect of acupuncture and massage combined with traditional Chinese medicine in patients with cervical spondylosis is superior to acupuncture and massage, and its safety is high. It is worth popularizing and applying in clinic.
【作者单位】：陕西省西安市中医医院;
【分类号】：R246.9

【相似文献】