“监管中心主义”语境下的社区矫正权责失衡问题——以浙江省J县司法局社区矫正监管工作为例

发布时间：2018-02-23 23:45

本文关键词： 基层司法行政机关监管工作社区矫正权责失衡监管中心主义契约论科层制　出处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：通过对浙江省J县社区矫正工作的调研,发现社区矫正仍然处于"监管中心主义"的实践状态下。目前社区矫正重中之重的监管工作却存在着"权力小、责任大"的权责失衡困境。基层司法行政机关在监管中承担了风险极高的脱管责任,却缺少采取强制羁押措施的权力和追捕权等必要的监管权力。同时,监管主体在人力资源上存在着执法人员数量配备不足、特定岗位的司法警察配置缺失等问题。在理论上,从契约论的拟制视角与科层制下的权责观念这两个角度对监管权力的正当性来源进行初步探讨,把社区矫正拟制为国家与公民之间签订的约束双方行为的契约,社区矫正人员应当承担相应的契约义务,监管权力作为在契约一方国家的权力,在本质上是一种契约理论上追究违约责任、保证契约目的实现的权力;在韦伯意义上的现代官僚制当中,责任与权力须保持一致,责任的承担需要相应的权力配置。
[Abstract]:Through the investigation of community correction work in J County, Zhejiang Province, it is found that community correction is still in the practice of "supervision centralism". At present, the most important supervision work of community correction is "small power". The dilemma of the imbalance between power and responsibility is very heavy. The grass-roots judicial administrative organs bear the extremely high risk of taking off the charge in the supervision, but they lack the necessary supervisory power, such as the power to take compulsory custody measures and the right to pursue them. At the same time, The main body of supervision has some problems in human resources, such as insufficient number of law enforcement personnel, lack of judicial police allocation in specific posts, etc. In theory, From the perspective of fictitious contract theory and the concept of power and responsibility under the hierarchy system, this paper makes a preliminary discussion on the source of legitimacy of supervision power, and puts the fictitious system of community correction as a contract signed between the state and citizens to restrain the behavior of both sides. Community correction personnel should undertake the corresponding contractual obligations, supervision power as a power in one of the countries, in essence, is a contract theory to investigate the responsibility for breach of contract, to ensure the realization of the purpose of the contract power; In Weber's sense of modern bureaucracy, responsibility and power must be consistent, and the responsibility needs corresponding allocation of power.
【作者单位】：吉林大学司法文明协同创新中心;吉林大学法学院;吉林大学理论法学研究中心;
【基金】：吉林大学研究生创新基金资助项目“司法权地方化问题研究”(2016055)
【分类号】：D926.8

【参考文献】