论精神病人刑事责任能力评定标准的制定

发布时间：2018-03-18 04:23

本文选题：司法精神病学　切入点：精神病人　出处：《中国司法鉴定》2008年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国刑事责任能力评定的法律依据是刑法第十八条,包含医学和法学两个要件,即必须是"精神病人",且辩论能力或控制能力必须受到损害。鉴定工作中,刑事责任能力的评定常出现意见分歧,根本原因在于缺乏全国统一的评定标准,必须制订相关评定标准来改变这种无序状况,但近十余年来相关评标准草案未能取得一致意见,主要是对评定标准拟订策略存在分歧。通过比较目前的两个主要草案,并结合国外拟订该类标准的策略,作者认为"精神障碍者刑事责任能力评定标准(草案)"破除了临床思维的框架,在确定医学要件的基础上,紧密联系刑法条款,以简驭繁,便于操作,避免了"以病定责",值得肯定。但该草案还有待进一步完善,建议将"草案"中使用的精神病学诊断标准改为"现行的国内或国际精神障碍诊断标准":另外,标准化评定工具评分标准可放在附录中,但不要列入评定标准正文内:对自愿摄入毒品所致的精神障碍者应从严评定其责任能力。
[Abstract]:The legal basis for the assessment of criminal liability capacity in China is Article 18th of the Criminal Law, which includes two elements of medicine and law, namely, "mental patient", and the ability to debate or control must be impaired. Differences of opinion often appear in the assessment of criminal liability capacity, the root cause is the lack of a unified national assessment standard. It is necessary to formulate relevant assessment standards to change this disorder situation. However, in the last decade or so, the relevant draft evaluation standards have failed to reach a consensus. By comparing the two main drafts of the present, and combining with the strategies adopted by foreign countries to formulate such standards, The author believes that the "Standards for evaluating the Criminal responsibility of Mental Disorders" breaks down the framework of clinical thinking, and, on the basis of determining the medical requirements, closely links with the provisions of criminal law in order to simplify and facilitate operation. To be sure, the "burden of illness" has been avoided... but the draft has yet to be further refined and it is recommended that the diagnostic criteria for psychiatry used in the draft be changed to "current national or international criteria for the diagnosis of mental disorders": in addition, The standardized assessment tool scoring criteria may be placed in the appendix, but not included in the body of the assessment standard: the mental disorders caused by voluntary drug intake should be strictly assessed on their ability to be responsible.
【作者单位】：四川大学华西临床医学院;
【分类号】：D919.3

【共引文献】