论我国民事诉讼鉴定启动程序

发布时间：2018-03-20 01:34

本文选题：鉴定结论　切入点：程序启动权　出处：《青岛大学》2009年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 鉴定程序的启动问题,是探讨鉴定制度的开门砖。目前世界上两大法系国家对鉴定启动程序都有比较系统的研究,并且随着二者诉讼模式的相互融合,鉴定启动程序也体现出相互借鉴融合的趋势。本文笔者对我国民事诉讼鉴定启动程序进行介绍,分析我国民事诉讼中鉴定启动程序的特点以及存在的不足,在借鉴两大法系国家鉴定启动程序先进经验的基础上,分析我国法院享有鉴定启动程序决定权的合理性,并从以下几个方面提出对我国鉴定启动程序的完善意见:明确法官审查当事人鉴定申请的法定标准,对法律问题以及某些事实问题的鉴定申请应当予以排除,以通知书的方式告知当事人是否同意其鉴定申请的理由,并对当事人申请救济的权利予以保障,如赋予当事人申请复议的权利;对鉴定市场进行规制,设立行业协会,明确收费标准,防止当事人自主委托鉴定对鉴定人中立性的破坏;对当事人申请鉴定的时间限制做弹性规定,对超过举证期限而仍有必要进行鉴定的情形,由法官根据是否符合公正审理的旨意据情决定;完善当事人对鉴定人的选任程序,细化落实当事人申请鉴定人回避的权利;对《证据规定》第二十八条规定的当事人重新申请鉴定的条件应当放宽,使双方当事人享有平等的鉴定申请权;明确鉴定材料提交过程中的“透明化”操作,即鉴定材料递交程序必须公开、合法,当事人对鉴定材料递交过程有参与质证和监督的权利等等。通过上述建议,以期使我国民事诉讼中的鉴定制度发挥其更好的科学指导作用,使其成为当事人维护自己合法权益以及法院维护公平正义的有力武器。
[Abstract]:The question of the initiation of the appraisal procedure is to discuss the open door brick of the appraisal system. At present, the countries of the two major legal systems in the world have comparatively systematic research on the identification initiation procedure, and with the mutual fusion of the two modes of litigation, The author introduces the procedure of identification and initiation of civil litigation in China, and analyzes the characteristics and shortcomings of the procedure of initiation of identification in civil litigation in China. On the basis of drawing lessons from the advanced experience of the identification and initiation procedure in the countries of two legal systems, this paper analyzes the reasonableness of the decision power of the court in our country. And from the following aspects, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the procedure for the initiation of appraisal in China: it is clear that the legal standard of the judge to examine the application for the identification of the parties concerned, and the application for the identification of the legal and some factual issues should be excluded. To inform the parties by notice whether they agree with the reasons for their application for appraisal, and to protect the right of the parties to apply for relief, such as giving the parties the right to apply for reconsideration, regulating the appraisal market, and setting up trade associations, To clarify the charging standard, to prevent the parties from independently entrusting the appraisal to destroy the neutral character of the authenticator, to make flexible provisions on the time limit for the parties to apply for the appraisal, and to make flexible provisions on the cases where it is still necessary to carry out the appraisal after the time limit of proof is exceeded, According to whether the judge is in accordance with the will of a fair trial according to the situation; perfect the procedure of selecting and appointing the expert, and implement the right of the party to apply for the expert's recusal; The conditions for the parties to re-apply for appraisal as stipulated in Article 28th shall be relaxed so that both parties shall enjoy equal rights to apply for appraisal, and the "transparency" operation in the process of submitting appraisal materials shall be clearly defined. That is, the procedure for submitting identification materials must be open and legal, and the parties have the right to participate in cross-examination and supervision of the process of submitting identification materials. It is hoped that the appraisal system in civil litigation in our country will play a better role in scientific guidance and become a powerful weapon for the parties concerned to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests and for the courts to safeguard fairness and justice.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D918.9

【参考文献】