未成年人犯罪司法解释瑕疵及改进

发布时间：2018-03-23 22:10

本文选题：未成年人犯罪　切入点：司法解释　出处：《南昌大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 未成年人犯罪司法解释是对未成年人犯罪法律条文含义的阐明,对未成年人犯罪法律条文的价值补充和对未成年人犯罪法律条文漏洞补充。但解释仍然存在着违反法定性原则和合理性、明确性原则的地方。一方面将奸淫幼女规定为不构成犯罪以及将未成年人盗窃近亲属设置为告诉才处理的解释逾法；另一方面,“相关证据”的标准不明、“偶尔”使用不当、强索行为性质的认定不明、随身携带的生活、学习用品或钱财数量的标准不明、“可以并处”的内涵不明、将垫付主体界定为不加任何限制的“其他人”不妥以及转化型抢劫犯的主体不明。应删除对未成年人盗窃近亲属为告诉才处理的规定、明确“相关证据”的种类及效力、将“偶尔”改“自愿”、钱财数量以行为定性为标准、“转化型抢劫犯的主体”增设一新的解释条款以明确主体并将垫付的主体限制为未成年人的近亲属。
[Abstract]:The judicial interpretation of juvenile delinquency is the clarification of the meaning of the legal provisions of juvenile delinquency. The value of the legal provisions on juvenile delinquency and the loopholes in the legal provisions on juvenile delinquency are supplemented. However, the interpretation still violates the principle of legality and reasonableness. Where the principle of clarity. On the one hand, the definition of adultery as an interpretation that does not constitute a crime and the theft of a close relative of a minor as a matter of notification is beyond the law; on the other hand, the standard of "relevant evidence" is unclear and "occasionally" used improperly. The identification of the nature of forced claims is unknown, the standard of living with them, the quantity of school supplies or money is unknown, and the connotation of "can be dealt with simultaneously" is unknown. The subject of advance payment shall be defined as the improper "other person" without any restriction, and the subject of transformed robber is not clear. The provisions dealing with the theft of close relatives of minors should be deleted, and the type and effect of "relevant evidence" should be clearly defined. "occasionally" change "voluntary", the quantity of money is defined as the standard of behavior, "the subject of transformed robber" is added a new interpretation clause is added to clarify the subject and limit the subject of advance payment to the minor's near relatives.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D669.5

【参考文献】