两岸社区矫正制度之比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-26 07:29

本文选题：海峡两岸社区矫正　切入点：比较研究　出处：《兰州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：社区矫正制度起源于19世纪末的英美国家,其通常适用于短期自由刑之犯罪。该制度因其实施有利于实现刑罚预防犯罪的目的、在避免短期自由刑流弊的同时,也减少了国家财政支出,且更符合刑罚人道化、谦抑性及个别化等现代刑罚理念,故现已广为世界各国刑事立法所采纳,并有日益扩大适用的趋势。目前两岸刑法皆有社区矫正方面的规定,即在定罪量刑并加以宣告后,或在犯罪行为较轻对象的刑罚执行期间,若有法定情形的出现,而采取的非监禁性矫正刑罚。然而两岸立法规范各有所不同,在相互的比较之下,亦凸显两岸社区矫正制度各自的特色和不足之处。为使社区矫正制度能达到刑事政策的预期效果,充分发挥该制度应有的功效,笔者于2016年2月至6月赴台湾交流学习期间,带着对我国大陆地区社区矫正工作的思考,对台湾地区的社区矫正工作进行了考察研究后,通过梳理两岸社区矫正制度诸多方面的不同,据以归纳并分析出两岸在社区矫正制度上的特色,然后针对当前两岸社区矫正制度进行立法比较,除理清两岸对社区矫正一般理论的差异性外,并进一步按现行社区矫正制度的相关规范内容,分别从两岸社区矫正的立法、制度构建,及运行等方面进行比较与探讨,在认识社区矫正制度所能发挥的应有功能的同时,也注意到其本身的局限性。文末正是对两岸社区矫正制度的评析与完善,借此分析我国大陆地区社区矫正制度上的不足,进而提出完善的思考。
[Abstract]:The community correction system originated in the Anglo-American countries at the end of the 19th century, which is usually applicable to the crime of short-term free punishment. Because its implementation is conducive to the realization of the purpose of criminal penalty prevention, it avoids the abuse of short-term free punishment at the same time. It has also reduced the national financial expenditure, and is more in line with the modern concepts of punishment, such as humanization, modesty and individualization, so it has now been widely adopted in criminal legislation around the world. And there is a trend of increasing application. At present, the criminal law of both sides of the strait has provisions on community correction, that is, after the conviction and sentencing has been declared, or during the execution of the punishment of the lighter target of the crime, if there is a statutory situation, However, the legislative norms of the two sides of the strait are different, under the comparison of each other, It also highlights the respective characteristics and shortcomings of the community correction system on both sides of the strait. In order to enable the community correction system to achieve the expected effect of the criminal policy, and to give full play to its due effect, the author went to Taiwan from February to June 2016 to exchange studies. With the consideration of the work of community correction in the mainland of China, after investigating and studying the work of community correction in Taiwan, through combing the differences in many aspects of the community correction system between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, On the basis of summarizing and analyzing the characteristics of the community correction system between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, the legislative comparison of the current community correction system between the two sides of the strait is carried out, in addition to clarifying the differences in the general theories of community correction between the two sides of the strait. Furthermore, according to the relevant norms of the current community correction system, this paper compares and probes into the legislation, system construction, and operation of community correction on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, so as to understand the functions that the community correction system can play at the same time. At the end of this paper, the author analyzes the shortcomings of the community correction system in mainland China and puts forward some thoughts on how to perfect it.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.8

【相似文献】