犯罪心理测试的价值定位与程序规制

发布时间：2018-04-08 07:30

本文选题：犯罪心理测试　切入点：测谎　出处：《燕山大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 犯罪心理测试技术是一项新兴的先进司法应用技术。此项技术主要运用心理学与生理学中的“刺激——反应”原理,通过检测被测人有无涉案的犯罪心理痕迹,达到区分作案者与无辜者的目的。传统的“测谎”假说并不科学。目前,犯罪心理测试技术主要运用于我国刑事司法领域,尤其在侦查阶段发挥着重要作用。尽管此项技术具有一定的局限性,但其原理的科学性与结论的可靠性已得到实践的证实。在肯定犯罪心理测试技术价值的基础上,进一步分析测试结论的证据属性问题。犯罪心理测试结论具有证据资格,本质上应当属于“鉴定结论”的范畴。就其证明力而言,犯罪心理测试结论不仅可以用来审查判断其他证据的真实性,它同样可以作为认定案件事实的依据。特别是当测试结论认定被测人是无辜者时,法院据此可以做出宣告被告人无罪的判决。但在认定被告人有罪方面,还需与其他证据结合起来共同认定案件事实。由于现行法律的模糊与行业标准的欠缺,导致犯罪心理测试技术在司法实践运用中出现混乱,此外,从犯罪心理测试主体、测试仪器、测试环境、测试程序等方面都处于一种无序状态。针对这些问题,应当从立法完善与技术操作角度加以规范。诸如需要立法明确犯罪心理测试结论的证据属性,赋予测试人员与鉴定人同等的法律地位,加强测试技术行业管理等方面,从而促进此项技术早日得到规范化应用与健康发展。
[Abstract]:Criminal psychology testing technology is a new advanced judicial application technology.This technique mainly uses the principle of "stimulus-response" in psychology and physiology to distinguish between the perpetrator and the innocent by detecting whether the person involved in the crime has criminal psychological trace or not.The traditional lie detector hypothesis is not scientific.At present, the criminal psychology test technology is mainly used in the field of criminal justice in China, especially in the phase of investigation plays an important role.Although this technique has some limitations, the scientific nature of its principle and the reliability of its conclusion have been proved by practice.On the basis of affirming the technical value of criminal psychological test, this paper further analyzes the evidence attribute of the test conclusion.The conclusion of criminal psychological test has the qualification of evidence and should belong to the category of "appraisal conclusion" in essence.As far as its proof is concerned, the conclusion of criminal psychological test can not only be used to examine and judge the authenticity of other evidence, but also as the basis for determining the facts of the case.Especially when the test concludes that the subject is innocent, the court can acquit the defendant accordingly.But in the aspect of finding the defendant guilty, it is necessary to combine with other evidence to identify the facts of the case.Due to the ambiguity of the current law and the lack of industry standards, there is confusion in the application of criminal psychology testing technology in judicial practice. In addition, from the subject of criminal psychology test, the test instrument, the test environment,Testing procedures and other aspects are in a state of disorder.In view of these problems, we should standardize them from the angle of legislative perfection and technical operation.For example, it is necessary to legislate to clarify the evidence attribute of the conclusion of criminal psychological test, to endow the testers with the same legal status as the connoisseur, to strengthen the management of the testing technology and so on, so as to promote the standardized application and healthy development of this technology as soon as possible.
【学位授予单位】：燕山大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D917

【参考文献】