当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 治安法论文 >

纠纷解决中的公安

发布时间:2018-04-15 01:07

  本文选题:公安机关 + 纠纷解决 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2010年硕士论文


【摘要】: 我们在研究当前纠纷解决的现状时,发现一个很普遍而又被广大法学研究者所忽略的现实存在:许多纠纷特别是相当数量的民间纠纷,是在基层派出所消化解决掉的。如果这些纠纷不经公安机关的“过滤”而直接涌向基层法院,则目前的基层法院将不堪重负。可见,在实然层面上,公安机关在纠纷解决中的作用是显而易见的。但是,“基层派出所在民间纠纷的解决和基层司法的系统中具有至关重要的作用,却很少引起法学界的重视”。①笔者在一城市基层派出所工作,工作中面对由民警出面解决各类纠纷的现状本来已习以为常,即认为此种状况“本来就是如此”。但随着对各种纠纷解决机制研究的深入,发现公安机关解决纠纷的状况并非“本来就是如此”这么简单。有许多问题在实际参与纠纷解决的当事人和学界当中都存在疑惑与争论。公安机关作为行政机关介入纠纷解决,不可避免地会引起公权力与私权利、强制与自治之间的紧张关系。公安机关在纠纷解决中的作用、介入纠纷的限度、公安纠纷解决与诉讼等其他纠纷解决机制间的关系以及对公安行政权力的控制等等,都是可在法学理论基础上作深入探讨的社会现实问题。在对以派出所为代表的公安解决纠纷的现状、原因进行客观描述和实证分析的基础上,笔者想就公安机关在纠纷解决中的作用及其评价,公安解决纠纷的方式和过程、与其他纠纷解决机制间的关系等问题进行探讨;进而对公安纠纷解决中存在的问题与制度的完善等问题进行理论论证和制度分析。
[Abstract]:When we study the present situation of dispute resolution, we find a very common reality which is ignored by the majority of law researchers: many disputes, especially a considerable number of civil disputes, are digested and resolved in the grass-roots police stations.If these disputes flow directly to the grassroots courts without the "filtering" of the public security organs, the current grassroots courts will be overwhelmed.Therefore, on the level of reality, the role of public security organs in dispute resolution is obvious.However, "the grass-roots police stations play a vital role in the settlement of civil disputes and the judicial system at the grass-roots level, but rarely attract the attention of the legal community." .1 the author works in a city's grass-roots police station.In the face of the police to resolve all kinds of disputes has become accustomed to the situation, that is, "this is the original situation."However, with the thorough study of various dispute resolution mechanisms, it is found that the situation of public security organs in resolving disputes is not so simple as originally.There are many problems in the parties and academic circles involved in dispute resolution.The public security organ, as an administrative organ, will inevitably cause tension between public power and private right, compulsion and autonomy.The role of public security organs in dispute resolution, the limits of intervention in disputes, the relationship between public security dispute resolution and other dispute resolution mechanisms such as litigation, and the control of public security administrative powers, etc.Both are social and realistic problems that can be discussed in depth on the basis of legal theory.On the basis of the objective description and empirical analysis of the present situation and the reasons of the police station's dispute resolution, the author would like to discuss the role and evaluation of the public security organ in the dispute resolution, and the way and process of the public security to resolve the dispute.The relationship between the system and other dispute settlement mechanisms is discussed, and the problems existing in the public security dispute resolution and the perfection of the system are discussed in theory and system analysis.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D631.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 赵银翠;杨建顺;;行政过程中的民事纠纷解决机制研究[J];法学家;2009年03期

2 麦宜生,王平;纠纷与法律需求——以北京的调查为例[J];江苏社会科学;2003年01期

3 周永坤;;信访潮与中国纠纷解决机制的路径选择[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年01期

4 应星;作为特殊行政救济的信访救济[J];法学研究;2004年03期

5 裴兆斌;张淑平;;治安调解:适用条件的解读与重构[J];理论与现代化;2009年01期

6 张建伟;正当程序:解决社会纠纷的最佳选择——王斌余案反思[J];人民检察;2005年19期

7 杨青;;民间调解的向度[J];特区经济;2007年07期

8 林莉红;;论信访的制度定位——从纠纷解决机制系统化角度的思考[J];学习与探索;2006年01期

9 朱最新;;社会转型中的行政调解制度[J];行政法学研究;2006年02期

10 于语和;刘志松;;我国人民调解制度及其重构——兼论民间调解对犯罪的预防[J];浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年02期



本文编号:1751820

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/1751820.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1809b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com