劳动教养保安处分化研究

发布时间：2018-04-25 10:27

本文选题：保安处分 + 劳动教养　；参考：《江西财经大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 保安处分制度是西方现代刑法理论的产物,它既是一种刑罚理论,也是一种刑法制度。它的产生是近代刑法思想发展演变的直接结果,其理论价值和所发挥的防卫社会的实际作用不容否认。保安处分作为刑法的一种救济措施,有其独立的特征,即保安处分的对象具有特殊性,保安处分具有救济性,处分的前置性及不定期性。其法理定性,在资产阶级刑法理论中,一直存在一元论与二元论之争。保安处分的适用原则,包括处分法定原则,处分必要性原则和处分相当性原则。劳动教养,是对有违法行为或有轻微犯罪行为,但尚不够刑事处罚的人实行强制性改造的行政措施。它在我国实施50余年的历史证明,这项制度的存在有其合理性和必要性。它在教育、挽救违法犯罪人员,维护社会治安方面发挥了重要的作用。但是由于劳动教养立法滞后,程序化的欠缺等方面的缺陷,导致劳动教养制度在实践中出现了许多问题。而要解决这些问题,惟有将劳动教养保安处分化,即劳动教养保安处分化有其必要性,亦即劳动教养保安处分化是克服劳动教养制度本身缺陷的必要性选择。劳动教养保安处分化不仅必要,而且可行。其可行性具体体现在以下几个方面:(1)保安处分自身存在的合理性和先进性;(2)保安处分可以替代劳动教养的功能;(3)保安处分在我国现有的法律体系中具有可操作性。基于上述考虑,笔者从宏观和微观方面提出了劳动教养保安处分化的立法构想。具体为:(1)宏观方面,以劳动教养立法为契机,先将其中涉及限制人身自由的一些措施、处分统一起来,建立强制教养处分制度,定性为刑事性保安处分单行法,等到时机成熟再制定一部统一的保安处分法典。(2)微观方面,具体包括强制教养处分的适用条件、适用对象和适用范围;强制教养处分的适用程序:强制教养处分的期限;强制教养处分的执行。
[Abstract]:Security measure system is the product of western modern criminal law theory, it is not only a penalty theory, but also a criminal law system. Its emergence is the direct result of the development and evolution of the thought of modern criminal law, and its theoretical value and the actual function of the defense society can not be denied. As a remedy measure of criminal law, security measure has its own characteristics, that is, the object of security measure has particularity, the security measure has relief nature, and the disposition is prefixed and irregular. In the theory of bourgeois criminal law, there has always been a dispute between monism and dualism. The applicable principles of security measures include the principle of legal disposition, the principle of necessity of disposition and the principle of equivalent disposition. Reeducation through labor is an administrative measure to carry out compulsory reformation to the person who has illegal act or minor crime but not enough criminal punishment. It has been practiced in China for more than 50 years and proved that the existence of this system is reasonable and necessary. It plays an important role in education, saving criminals and maintaining public order. However, there are many problems in the practice of the reeducation through labor system due to the shortcomings of the legislation of reeducation through labor and the lack of procedure. In order to solve these problems, it is necessary to divide the security branch of reeducation through labor, that is, the division of security branch of reeducation through labor is the necessary choice to overcome the defects of the system of reeducation through labor. Reeducation through labor security division is not only necessary, but also feasible. Its feasibility is embodied in the following several aspects: 1) the rationality and advanced nature of the existence of security measures. (2) Security measures can replace the function of reeducation through labor. 3) Security measures are operable in the existing legal system of our country. Based on the above considerations, the author puts forward the legislative conception of the division of reeducation through labor security service from macro and micro aspects. Specifically, in the macro aspect, taking legislation on re-education through labor as a turning point, first unifying the measures involved in restricting personal freedom, establishing a system of compulsory correctional measures, characterizing it as a criminal law on security measures. Wait until the time is ripe to formulate a unified code of security measures. 2) microscopic aspects, including the applicable conditions of compulsory correctional punishment, the applicable object and scope, the applicable procedure of compulsory correctional punishment: the time limit of compulsory correctional punishment; Enforcement of compulsory correctional sanctions
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D926.8

【参考文献】