中国大城市流动人口幸福感研究——以上海为例

发布时间：2018-05-04 15:01

本文选题：流动人口 + 幸福感　；参考：《现代城市研究》2015年12期

【摘要】：随着中国发展进入"新常态"阶段,提升"人口城镇化"质量成为中国新型城镇化建设的重要议题,居民幸福感将成为评价城镇化质量的重要依据之一。基于上海大规模问卷调查数据,对中国大城市流动人口幸福感进行研究,采用Logistic回归分析从个人因素、家庭因素、城市社区因素、农村因素、制度因素等维度对其影响机制进行了探究。研究发现,58.4%的流动人口幸福感较低,80.0%的流动人口表示打算长期居住,形成"幸福感低但居住意愿高"的独特现象。第二,家庭因素、社区因素与制度因素对流动人口的幸福感影响最为明显,其中,流动人口主动融入所在社区的程度、社区对流动人口的接纳程度、居住形式、住房性质、是否持有暂住证、是否拥有城市养老保险、家庭收入等是其中最为显著的影响因素。基于此,建议大城市加强流动人口社区建设,进一步放宽流动人口入户制度,将长期居住于城市的流动人口家庭纳入城市保障体系,并进一步缩小城乡发展差距,培育农村经济,增加农村家庭收入与发展机会,推动流动人口在"回流"农村或继续定居城市之间作出更有利于其家庭发展的选择。
[Abstract]:With the development of China into the "new normal" stage, improving the quality of "population urbanization" has become an important issue in the construction of new urbanization in China, and the well-being of residents will become an important basis for evaluating the quality of urbanization. Based on the data of large-scale questionnaire survey in Shanghai, this paper studies the happiness of floating population in large cities of China, and adopts Logistic regression analysis to analyze the factors of individual, family, urban community and rural areas. Institutional factors and other dimensions of its impact mechanism was explored. The study found that 58.4% of the floating population had lower well-being and 80.0% of the floating population said they intended to live for a long period of time, resulting in a unique phenomenon of "low happiness but high willingness to live". Second, family factors, community factors and institutional factors have the most obvious impact on the well-being of the floating population. Among them, the degree of active integration of the floating population into the community, the acceptance degree of the community to the floating population, the living form, the nature of housing, Whether to hold temporary residence permit, whether to own the urban old-age insurance, family income and so on are the most significant influencing factors. Based on this, it is suggested that large cities should strengthen the construction of floating population communities, further relax the floating population entry system, integrate the floating population families living in cities for a long time into the urban security system, and further narrow the gap between urban and rural development. Cultivate rural economy, increase rural household income and development opportunities, promote the floating population to "return" to the rural areas or continue to settle in the city between more conducive to the development of their families.
【作者单位】：江西省城乡规划设计研究院规划二所;东南大学建筑学院;伦敦大学学院巴特雷特建筑环境学院城市规划系;武汉大学城市设计学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(41271163、40601033、41130747) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(11JZD028);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助(NCET-12-0571) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目编号:2242015S10011) 同济大学“高密度人居环境生态与节能教育部重点实验室”项目《高密度人居环境中的“微区位”研究方法探索》资助
【分类号】：D631.42;C912.6

【参考文献】