论我国保安矫治制度的构建

发布时间：2018-06-02 15:47

本文选题：劳教改革 + 保安矫治　；参考：《湘潭大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 劳动教养制度已经运行了五十多年,发挥了重大历史作用,但在创立之初,由于国家经济落后、财政收入严重不足、法律制度不健全,在发展过程中相关立法未能及时跟进,在一定程度上蜕变为所谓的“二劳改”。随着我国法治化进程的加快,其缺陷、弊端日益突显,严重违背正当程序原则,无法有效保障人权,不能适应新形势发展的需要,亟待进行改善,真正实现其挽救、感化、教育、再社会化、预防犯罪、防卫社会和安置就业的价值功能,有利于我国政府在国际人权斗争中争取主动。同时,与其类似的法律措施如收容教养、收容教育、强制隔离戒毒(强制戒毒)、强制医疗、工读学校都与保安处分制度在价值功能上大同小异,但也都存在同样的缺陷和问题。这些问题逐渐引起了广大法学研究者的关注,笔者希望通过自己的一些学习和探索找到一些有效的途径解决这一长期困扰立法者和执法者的问题,为进一步丰富我国的法学理论、切实保护广大民众的权利、维护国家法制统一、建设中国特色的法治体系贡献一份力量。本文首先就我国相关制度的历史、现状、问题与域外相关的成功经验和先进制度进行分析比较,认为我国应该借鉴保安处分制度整合相关制度和资源,利用《违法行为矫治法》讨论、制定之良好契机,构建起具有中国特色的保安矫治制度。其次,本文在国内众多学者研究成果的基础上就该制度的框架进行了大胆设想:将《违法行为矫治法》更名为《保安矫治法》;明确了该制度的价值功能;对《保安矫治法》的内容进行了初步设想,包括司法决定模式和程序构建、各种矫治措施的种类、期限,从而为我国相关制度的改善和进一步发展提供法律支撑。最后,本文就矫治措施的执行管理模式进行了初步设计,结合劳教场所执行方式改革取得的经验和成果,顺应世界潮流,凸显执行方式的社会化、灵活性,从而体现出新型矫治措施与刑罚、劳动教养、收容教养、强制戒毒等措施的区别。
[Abstract]:The system of re-education through labour has been in operation for more than 50 years and has played an important historical role. However, at the beginning of its establishment, due to the backward economy of the country, the serious shortage of financial revenue, and the unsound legal system, the relevant legislation failed to follow up in time during the development process. To some extent, the transformation into the so-called "two-labor reform." With the speeding up of the process of rule of law in our country, its defects and drawbacks are becoming more and more prominent, which seriously violate the principle of due process, cannot effectively protect human rights, and cannot adapt to the needs of the development of the new situation. The value functions of education, re-socialization, crime prevention, social defense and employment placement are helpful for our government to take the initiative in the international human rights struggle. At the same time, the similar legal measures, such as rehousing, receiving education, compulsory isolation detoxification (compulsory detoxification, compulsory medical treatment, work-study schools) all have the same value function as the system of security measures, but they all have the same defects and problems. These problems have gradually aroused the attention of the majority of legal researchers. The author hopes to find some effective ways to solve this long-standing problem of legislators and law enforcers through his own study and exploration. In order to further enrich the legal theory of our country, protect the rights of the masses, safeguard the unity of the national legal system, and build the legal system with Chinese characteristics. Firstly, this paper analyzes and compares the history, current situation, problems and successful experiences and advanced systems of the relevant systems in China, and concludes that our country should draw lessons from the system of security measures to integrate relevant systems and resources. Using the discussion of the Law of Correction of illegal acts and the good opportunity to establish the system of security correction with Chinese characteristics. Secondly, on the basis of the research results of many domestic scholars, this paper makes a bold assumption on the framework of the system: renaming the illegal behavior Correction Law to "Security Correction Law", clarifying the value function of the system; The content of "Security Correction Law" is preliminarily conceived, including the construction of judicial decision mode and procedure, the types and duration of various corrective measures, which provides legal support for the improvement and further development of the relevant system in China. Finally, this article has carried on the preliminary design to the correctional measure execution management pattern, unifies the experience and the achievement of the reform of the implementation mode of the place of re-education through labor, conforms to the world tide, highlights the execution way socialization, the flexibility, The difference between new treatment measures and punishment, reeducation through labor, institutionalization, compulsory detoxification and so on.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D926.8

【参考文献】