群体性事件发生的认知心理机制及其法治化防控

发布时间：2018-06-24 13:11

本文选题：群体性事件 + 认知心理机制　；参考：《学术交流》2017年08期

【摘要】：国内外学术界对于群体性事件发生的社会心理机制讨论较多,但却相对忽视了个体参与者认知心理因素更为基础性的驱导功用与评估调控。从角色定位与演化过程相结合的双重视角准确认识和把握群体性事件,在此基础上借助认知心理学的智识工具,精细化探究群体性事件发生的认知心理机制,可以发现包括相对剥离感、归因偏差、认知偏见等认知影响因子的交互作用,共同催化群体性事件的形成。群体性事件生成的认知心理机制揭示,有助于从源头上进行群体性事件的化解应对。对此其法治化防控治理既是可行必要的,又是最为可欲的。群体性事件防控治理对策在立法方面供学术讨论的空间其实很有限,在执法维度上要全面推进依法行政,注重心理危机干预与疏导,同时设置事件的多方救济渠道,构建政府、社会与市场协商共治框架;在司法维度上要注意铸就司法权威,采取事件处理的多元化纠纷解决机制,同时推广第三方诉讼服务模式,构建与法院诉讼的良好衔接。
[Abstract]:There is much discussion about the social psychological mechanism of group events in the academic circles at home and abroad, but the more basic driving function and evaluation regulation of cognitive psychological factors of individual participants are neglected. From the dual perspective of the combination of role orientation and evolution process, we can accurately understand and grasp the group events, and on this basis, with the help of the intellectual tools of cognitive psychology, we can finely explore the cognitive psychological mechanism of the occurrence of group events. It can be found that the interaction of cognitive factors, such as relative detachment, attribution bias and cognitive bias, catalyzes the formation of group events. The cognitive psychological mechanism of the formation of group events is helpful to resolve the group events from the source. Therefore, it is necessary and most desirable to control the prevention and control by law. In fact, the space for academic discussion on the countermeasures of prevention and control of mass incidents is very limited. In the dimension of law enforcement, we should comprehensively promote administration according to law, pay attention to psychological crisis intervention and guidance, and set up various relief channels for incidents, so as to build a government. In the judicial dimension, we should pay attention to the judicial authority, adopt the diversified dispute resolution mechanism to deal with events, promote the service mode of third party litigation, and construct a good connection with the court litigation.
【作者单位】：山东理工大学法学院;浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“审判中心视域下的司法假定方法检验研究”(16YJC820009) 浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“论认知风格对法官决策差异形成的影响”(17NDJC195YB)
【分类号】：D631.43

【相似文献】