当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 治安法论文 >

秘密侦查及其控制

发布时间:2018-06-29 03:05

  本文选题:秘密侦查 + 程序控制 ; 参考:《吉林大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:文章先通过对秘密侦查的概念、特征和分类等进行介绍,再指出秘密侦查在运行过程中存在的诸如侵犯个人权利的各种风险,然后着重将中美德三国对秘密侦查的控制相比较,试图寻找出西方国家对秘密侦查控制值得借鉴的经验。在此基础上,,对我国秘密侦查在法律规制和实践中存在的问题及成因进行分析,并对我国秘密侦查的完善提出一些构想,以期实现秘密侦查在犯罪控制与人权保障上的平衡。本文共分四部分,内容如下: 第一部分是秘密侦查概述。该部分以对秘密侦查的本质进行揭示的方式来界定秘密侦查的概念,再对秘密侦查特征和分类做进一步分析,然后对秘密侦查的法律规范做一介绍,力图从整体上对秘密侦查有个全面的认识。 第二部分是秘密侦查的风险与控制。该部分先对秘密侦查手段的使用存在的主要风险进行阐述,认为最主要的风险是对秘密侦查对象权利的侵犯以及对伦理道德的冲击。接着将中美德三国在实体和程序上对秘密侦查控制的几个主要方面进行比较,从中可以发现我国与美国、德国在秘密侦查控制上的区别,目的就是希望从比较中发现我国秘密侦查在规范与控制上存在的不足。 第三部分是我国秘密侦查存在的问题及成因。该部分分别从法律规制和司法实践两个层面对我国秘密侦查存在的问题进行了阐述,并对存在问题的原因进行了剖析。认为我国秘密侦查主要存在程序控制与人权的保障救济等方面的不足。认为我国秘密侦查现存问题的主要原因是国家对秘密侦查的严密控制、传统观念的束缚、中国司法权力配置的特点以及政治因素的影响等。 第四部分是完善我国秘密侦查的构想。该部分首先对秘密侦查法治化应遵循的基本原则进行论述,认为主要有程序法定原则、比例原则、司法审查原则、权利救济原则。其次对我国秘密侦查法治化提出一些具体的构想,比如加强监督制约、建立违法秘密侦查的制裁机制、建立权利救济机制等等,希望我国秘密侦查的运行能够以最小限度的权利牺牲来换取最大的犯罪控制效果。
[Abstract]:This paper first introduces the concept, characteristics and classification of secret investigation, then points out the various risks such as infringing individual rights in the course of secret investigation, and then compares the control of secret investigation between China and Germany. Try to find out the western countries to secret investigation control is worth learning experience. On this basis, this paper analyzes the problems and causes of our country's secret investigation in the legal regulation and practice, and puts forward some ideas on the perfection of our country's secret investigation, in order to achieve the balance between crime control and human rights guarantee in secret investigation. This article is divided into four parts, the content is as follows: the first part is an overview of secret investigation. This part defines the concept of secret investigation in the way of revealing the essence of secret investigation, further analyzes the characteristics and classification of secret investigation, and then introduces the legal norms of secret investigation. Try to have a comprehensive understanding of secret investigation on the whole. The second part is the risk and control of secret investigation. In this part, the author expounds the main risks in the use of secret investigative techniques, and thinks that the most important risk is the infringement of the rights of the object of secret investigation and the impact on ethics and morality. Then, by comparing the three countries of China and Germany in substance and procedure to control secret investigation, we can find the difference between China and the United States and Germany in the control of secret investigation. The purpose of this study is to find out the deficiencies in the regulation and control of secret investigation in China. The third part is the problems and causes of secret investigation in China. In this part, the author expounds the problems of secret investigation in China from the aspects of legal regulation and judicial practice, and analyzes the causes of the problems. The author thinks that there are some shortcomings in secret investigation in our country, such as procedural control and human rights guarantee and remedy. It is believed that the main reasons for the existing problems of secret investigation in China are the strict control of secret investigation by the state, the bondage of traditional concepts, the characteristics of the allocation of judicial power in China and the influence of political factors, etc. The fourth part is the idea of perfecting the secret investigation in our country. This part first discusses the basic principles that should be followed in the rule of law of secret investigation, and thinks that there are mainly the principle of procedural law, the principle of proportionality, the principle of judicial review and the principle of right relief. Secondly, it puts forward some concrete ideas on the rule of law of secret investigation in our country, such as strengthening supervision and restriction, establishing sanction mechanism of illegal secret investigation, establishing right relief mechanism, and so on. It is hoped that the operation of secret investigation in our country can exchange the minimum right sacrifice for the maximum crime control effect.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D918

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘向红;对秘密侦查法治化的思考[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报.社会公共安全研究;2001年06期

2 苗青秀;;论秘密侦查制度的立法规范[J];公民与法(法学版);2012年03期

3 谢佑平;邓立军;;德国的秘密侦查制度[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2011年06期

4 王云;;试论我国技术侦查立法的完善[J];法制与社会;2012年36期

5 兰跃军;;比较法视野中的技术侦查措施[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2013年05期

6 蔡杰;肖伟;;程序控制与权利制约语境下的侦查权控制[J];山西警官高等专科学校学报;2008年01期

7 宋显忠;;通过法律的权利保障[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2006年05期

8 宋显忠;刘怡;;程序与程序保障[J];吉林公安高等专科学校学报;2006年05期

9 刘卫东;;《爱国者法》及其对美国公民权利的影响[J];美国研究;2006年01期

10 高哲远;;侦查监督视野下技术侦查研究[J];河南警察学院学报;2012年06期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 王文生;国家非公开行使权力的法治[D];中共中央党校;2011年



本文编号:2080561

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2080561.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5496b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com