云时代中国数据主权与安全研究
发布时间：2018-07-31 07:32
【摘要】：数据主权是云时代大数据环境下,网权和主权层面的链接,数据主权在一定程度上塑造了新的地缘政治,国家之间的竞争有了新的高地,“斯诺登”事件催生了全球关注自身的网络安全以及数据主权。云时代一国的数据能力作为结构性权力的维度之一,在国际竞争中起着越来越凸出的作用,而数据主权亦是云时代国家主权理论的新发展,和相互依赖逻辑一样,网络空间中数据主权也存在着敏感性以及脆弱性。推动中国的数据主权建设有利于维护国家主权权威和合法性,有利于我国的数据自主性安全建设,弥补安全短板推动我国的总体安全建设。云数据技术作为一种新兴的技术,其本身存在着技术上的漏洞,各国关于数据法律的差异加剧了主权的风险,而现实中的霸权国在数据领域的进攻性凸显,这点从“斯诺登”事件中是很明显的体现出来,赛博战争已经成为西方遏华的新手段,而我国对于自身网络安全的忧患意识则有待提高。中国是一个网络数据大国,但是远非网络强国,中国在发展大数据技术上面临着诸多的制约,中国作为未来世界秩序变革的领导者,在网络数据主权上也应当奉行一种“增量改进”的策略,由于数据主权和安全维护是一个涉及内政和外交的系统工程,中国亦应当依托科技创新,加强国内改革,巩固自身的网络数据边防,在区域的安全合作框架内开展跨国性的“网络安全演习”,倡导网络裁军,推动全球网络治理回归到联合国的权威上,倡导多边、民主、透明的全球网络治理。
[Abstract]:Data sovereignty is the link between network power and sovereignty level under the environment of big data in the cloud era. To a certain extent, data sovereignty has shaped new geopolitics, and the competition among countries has a new high ground. Snowden has spawned a global focus on its own cyber security and data sovereignty. As one of the dimensions of structural power, the data capability of a country in the cloud era plays a more and more prominent role in the international competition, and the data sovereignty is also a new development of the theory of state sovereignty in the cloud era, just like the logic of interdependence. There is also sensitivity and vulnerability to data sovereignty in cyberspace. Promoting the construction of China's data sovereignty is conducive to safeguarding the authority and legitimacy of national sovereignty, to the construction of data autonomy and security in China, and to making up for the short board of security to promote the overall security construction of our country. Cloud data technology, as a new technology, has its own technical loopholes. The differences of data laws between countries have aggravated the risk of sovereignty, while the hegemonic countries in reality are striking in the field of data. This is evident from the Snowden incident. The cyberwar has become a new means of suppressing China in the West, while our country's awareness of its own network security needs to be improved. China is a large country of network data, but far from a network power. China faces many constraints in developing big data technology. China is the leader of the future world order reform. In terms of the sovereignty over network data, we should also pursue a strategy of "incremental improvement". Since data sovereignty and security maintenance are a systematic project involving domestic and foreign affairs, China should also rely on scientific and technological innovations to strengthen domestic reform. Consolidating their own cyber-data borders, conducting transnational "cybersecurity exercises" within the framework of regional security cooperation, advocating cyberdisarmament, promoting global cybergovernance back to the authority of the United Nations, advocating multilateralism and democracy, Transparent global network governance.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TP309;D631
[Abstract]:Data sovereignty is the link between network power and sovereignty level under the environment of big data in the cloud era. To a certain extent, data sovereignty has shaped new geopolitics, and the competition among countries has a new high ground. Snowden has spawned a global focus on its own cyber security and data sovereignty. As one of the dimensions of structural power, the data capability of a country in the cloud era plays a more and more prominent role in the international competition, and the data sovereignty is also a new development of the theory of state sovereignty in the cloud era, just like the logic of interdependence. There is also sensitivity and vulnerability to data sovereignty in cyberspace. Promoting the construction of China's data sovereignty is conducive to safeguarding the authority and legitimacy of national sovereignty, to the construction of data autonomy and security in China, and to making up for the short board of security to promote the overall security construction of our country. Cloud data technology, as a new technology, has its own technical loopholes. The differences of data laws between countries have aggravated the risk of sovereignty, while the hegemonic countries in reality are striking in the field of data. This is evident from the Snowden incident. The cyberwar has become a new means of suppressing China in the West, while our country's awareness of its own network security needs to be improved. China is a large country of network data, but far from a network power. China faces many constraints in developing big data technology. China is the leader of the future world order reform. In terms of the sovereignty over network data, we should also pursue a strategy of "incremental improvement". Since data sovereignty and security maintenance are a systematic project involving domestic and foreign affairs, China should also rely on scientific and technological innovations to strengthen domestic reform. Consolidating their own cyber-data borders, conducting transnational "cybersecurity exercises" within the framework of regional security cooperation, advocating cyberdisarmament, promoting global cybergovernance back to the authority of the United Nations, advocating multilateralism and democracy, Transparent global network governance.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TP309;D631
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何花;;浅议货币主权的法律问题[J];商;2012年13期
2 王逸舟;树立世纪之交的新主权观[J];w挛胖芸，
本文编号：2154869
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2154869.html
