GKT原理的卡片测试范式实验研究

发布时间：2018-10-15 15:37

【摘要】：研究设计了三种包含不同说谎和认知成分的回答方式,以无意义字母串为刺激材料,以60名被试为对象检验GKT对犯罪嫌疑人的识别是基于认知还是说谎反应。研究结果表明:(1)仅包含认知成分的"重复"回答方式条件下,GKT能够区分关键信息和控制信息,表明认知成分存在于GKT测谎模式的运作机制中。(2)包含相同认知成分、不同说谎成分的回答方式条件下,GKT对知道关键信息的"犯罪"者的反应判定准确性不同:"不是..."回答方式下反应判定的准确性最高,重复回答方式下的判定准确性最低,由此证实说谎成分存在于GKT机制中。(3)仅包含认知成分的回答方式反应判定准确性最低,说谎成分的加入显著提高判定准确率。说谎成分与认知成分在GKT原理中的比重尚需进一步探索。
[Abstract]:Three types of responses with different lying and cognitive components were designed to test whether the identification of suspects by GKT was based on cognitive or lying responses using meaningless alphabetic strings as stimulus materials and 60 subjects as subjects. The results show that: (1) under the condition of "repetitive" response with only cognitive components, GKT can distinguish between key information and control information, indicating that cognitive components exist in the operating mechanism of GKT lie detection mode. (2) it contains the same cognitive components. The accuracy of GKT's response to a "criminal" who knows the key information is different under different lying elements: "No." The accuracy of response judgment was the highest in the response mode, and the lowest in the repeated response mode, which confirmed that the lying component existed in the GKT mechanism. (3) the accuracy of the response judgment was the lowest in the response judgment with only cognitive components. The addition of lying components significantly improved the accuracy of judgment. The proportion of lying and cognitive components in GKT principle needs further exploration.
【作者单位】：浙江师范大学教师教育学院心理系;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(30670696) 浙江师范大学“说谎的心理学研究”创新团队基金资助
【分类号】：D918

【参考文献】