最优城市规模与特大城市户籍管制的自增强机制
[Abstract]:In order to relieve the pressure of comprehensive carrying capacity, megacities with a population of more than 5 million tend to control the population size through strict household registration control policy, but in reality, the phenomenon of "more and more residents and more population control" exists in the mega-cities. Based on the theory of optimal urban scale, this paper puts forward the self-reinforcing mechanism of household registration control in mega-cities and analyzes its forming process. The study found that strict household registration control policies have not changed the scale benefits of urban population growth while reducing the crowded cost of exclusive public goods in mega-cities. This makes the theoretical value of optimal scale increase when the marginal scale income and marginal congestion cost are equal, and the urban population tends to increase further, resulting in more strict household registration control. Based on the data of 286 prefecture-level cities, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the self-enhancement mechanism of household registration control. It is found that the strengthening of household registration control is not conducive to the increase of income in small and medium-sized cities, but also to the increase of income in large cities and mega-cities. Cities with larger population size have the tendency to strengthen household registration control; The increase of household registration control makes the peak position of the inverted U-shaped curve between urban per capita income and population scale move to the right, thus raising the level of optimal population scale in mega-cities and further promoting the inflow of population. Under strict household registration control, the actual population size of most megacities is still not up to the theoretical value of optimal population size, and there is still a tendency to increase the population further. The policy implication of the self-reinforcing mechanism of household registration control is that, at present, China's mega-cities have been caught in a vicious circle of increased household registration control and an increase in urban population. The policy of controlling the size of urban population through strict household registration control is ineffective, but further liberalizing the restrictions of residence is an effective way to solve the population of megacities. At the same time, it is necessary to improve the supply level of non-exclusive public goods in small and medium-sized cities to guide the orderly transfer of newly added non-registered residents, and finally to make the megacities withdraw from the self-reinforcing mechanism of household registration control.
【作者单位】: 中共中央党校经济学教研部;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金青年项目“农民工市民化进程中制度冲突与协调问题研究”(批准号:15CJL033)
【分类号】:D631.42
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邹一南;李爱民;;户籍管制、城市规模与城市发展[J];当代经济研究;2013年09期
2 刘保瑞;略论我国城市社会稳定的建构[J];山东公安专科学校学报;2004年02期
3 阿碧;;城市中潜伏的罪恶[J];检察风云;2008年16期
4 韩凤春;王景升;;我国城市停车发展战略研究[J];中国人民公安大学学报(自然科学版);2006年02期
5 班茂盛;户籍改革试点:小城镇的调查与思考[J];浙江学刊;2000年01期
6 刘武俊;;从北京的户籍制度说起[J];法学天地;2001年12期
7 夏波光;户籍改革打破坚冰[J];中国社会保障;2001年10期
8 李和平;户籍改革──居住证管理是户籍制度发展的必然趋势[J];上海综合经济;2001年10期
9 李静;大城市的户籍改革难在何处?[J];上海综合经济;2001年10期
10 刘武俊;变法——户籍改革的制度化路径[J];小城镇建设;2001年11期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 黄瑞莲;;户籍改革要为经济建设松绑[A];湖南省人口管理与青少年犯罪研究征文评奖论文集[C];2007年
2 萧衡锺;;中国大陆于社会转型期的户籍改革——管理、制度与治理[A];2011城市国际化论坛——全球化进程中的大都市治理(论文集)[C];2011年
3 ;会议上半场问答[A];2013年春季CMRC中国经济观察(总第33期)[C];2013年
4 黄兴年;;城市“户籍红利”的消除与城乡居民政治权利的无缝对接成本分析[A];首届湖湘三农论坛论文集(中)[C];2008年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 主持常雪丽 杨永勤;探索城市“治堵”之路[N];人民代表报;2011年
2 朱珊珊;综合执法的难题及对策[N];济宁日报;2006年
3 邓海建;户籍改革更要“效果图”[N];中国改革报;2007年
4 康劲;甘肃户籍改革将统一城乡福利[N];工人日报;2007年
5 唐勇林;九成公众认为户籍改革很有必要[N];贵阳日报;2007年
6 滕卉荣;东中西进程不一 户籍改革艰难前行[N];中国县域经济报;2007年
7 《商务时报》特约评论员 胡星斗 作者系北京理工大学教授;缩小地区差距,着眼大户籍改革[N];商务时报;2007年
8 陈贞t,
本文编号:2377997
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2377997.html