司法会计鉴定结论质证方法探讨
发布时间：2019-03-05 16:51
【摘要】：司法会计鉴定结论同所有鉴定结论一样,并不具备天然的"权威性",其证明力如何,须经法院审查和当事人的互相质证,这是一种正当的程序保障,有助于体现诉讼的公正性。本文从技术操作层面分析探讨了司法会计鉴定结论质证的方法。
[Abstract]:Judicial accounting expert conclusion, like all appraisal conclusions, does not possess natural "authority", and its probative power is subject to examination by the court and mutual cross-examination by the parties, which is a kind of due process guarantee. It helps to embody the fairness of the lawsuit. This paper analyzes and discusses the method of forensic accounting conclusion cross-examination from the aspect of technical operation.
【作者单位】： 四川恒中司法鉴定所;
【分类号】：D918.95
[Abstract]:Judicial accounting expert conclusion, like all appraisal conclusions, does not possess natural "authority", and its probative power is subject to examination by the court and mutual cross-examination by the parties, which is a kind of due process guarantee. It helps to embody the fairness of the lawsuit. This paper analyzes and discusses the method of forensic accounting conclusion cross-examination from the aspect of technical operation.
【作者单位】： 四川恒中司法鉴定所;
【分类号】：D918.95
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王素芳;;关于司法鉴定人出庭作证制度的思考[J];前沿;2011年14期
2 首云翠;;单方鉴定结论采信问题探析——以民事诉讼为视角[J];法制与社会;2011年26期
3 尼玛;;浅论刑事科学技术鉴定结论的审查判断[J];法制与社会;2011年21期
4 尼玛曲珍;;浅谈刑事侦查中的鉴定程序[J];西藏科技;2011年08期
5 郁晓明;朱奕;蔡同镛;;关于知识产权技术鉴定的探讨[J];江苏科技信息;2007年04期
6 陈镇国;郝涛;李珊;;《司法鉴定之惑》专题报道之二 两起刑案鉴定背后的真相[J];民主与法制;2011年11期
7 王桂s，
本文编号：2435109
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2435109.html
