无侵权人见义勇为补偿纠纷案评析

发布时间：2018-01-11 18:13

本文关键词：无侵权人见义勇为补偿纠纷案评析　出处：《湖南大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着网络和媒体的发展，越来越多的关于见义勇为者因见义勇为导致身体、精神和财产损失却得不到救助的案件引发社会的讨论和关注。在民事法律实务中，与之相关的见义勇为者权益保护以及受益人补偿责任的法律适用问题亦特别值得研究。吴某因帮助同村居民支某救火而遭受人身损害，向人民法院起诉。在案件审理过程中，原、被告双方在原告的行为是否构成见义勇为行为、受益人是否应该承担补偿责任以及受益人是否应该承担精神损害赔偿的一系列问题产生了很大的分歧，成为案件的争议焦点。对于这一系列问题的解决，首先应该明确见义勇为的民法定义和构成要件，见义勇为行为是指没有法定或约定的义务,为了使国家、社会、集体的公共利益或他人的人身、财产等合法权益免受侵害,在紧急情况下实施的与违法犯罪行为作斗争或救人、抢险、救灾的合法行为。对于见义勇为的民法认定不宜过严，符合见义勇为的构成要件即可成立。对于受益人承担补偿责任的问题主要是我国民法中关于见义勇为的相关规定的法律适用问题，，我国的相关法律规定不统一，造成了实务中同类案件法律适用不同的问题，对于这个问题的解决，建议以无因管理为理论基础，丰富《民法通则》第93条的内容，删除《民法通则》第109条，解决了法律适用的问题，关于受益人是否承担精神损害赔偿的问题也就迎刃而解了。明确见义勇为的认定，解决无侵权人见义勇为的法律适用问题，有利于见义勇为者权益的保护，以维护社会的公平正义，倡导社会的道德风尚。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the network and the media, more and more about the courageous because of the courageous cause physical, mental and property loss but not rescue cases caused social concern and discuss. In the civil law practice, the related rights protection and courageous beneficiaries compensation liability legal problems are particularly worthy of study.
Wu for help villagers the support of a fire and suffered personal injury, to the people's court. In the case of the trial, the original defendant, whether in the plaintiff's behavior constitutes a courageous behavior, a series of problems if the beneficiary should bear the compensation liability and the beneficiary should bear the compensation for mental damage caused great differences become the controversial focus of the case. To solve a series of problems, first of all should be clearly defined and courageous civil elements, courageous behavior does not refer to legal or contractual obligations, in order to make the state, society, collective public interests or the legitimate rights and interests of others, such as the implementation of property from infringement, in case of emergency fight or rescue, and criminal acts of rescue, relief the legal behavior. The courageous civil law that should not be too strict, meet the courageous. Elements can be established. The beneficiaries bear the compensation liability is the main problem of the applicable law on the relevant provisions for civil law of our country, the relevant laws and regulations in China are not unified, caused by different problems of similar cases in the practical application of the law, to solve this problem, suggestions on causelessness management theory rich, "general principles of civil law > ninety-third content, delete < > 109th of the general principles of the civil law, to solve the problem of the applicable law, the beneficiary on whether to take the mental damage compensation issues have clearly identified courageous smoothly done or easily solved. In order to solve the problem of application of law, no infringement people courageous, is conducive to the protection of the rights and interests of courageous, to safeguard social fairness and justice, promote social morality.

【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923;D920.5

【参考文献】