日本和德国法上的再交涉义务及对我国合同法的启示

发布时间：2018-01-24 07:33

本文关键词： 再交涉情事变更义务自主交涉　出处：《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：日本和德国学者均把再交涉义务定位为诉讼上行使合同变更请求权和解除请求权之前必须要历经完成的程序性的步骤,是以促进当事人的自主交涉为目的的行为规范。在解释论上,我国合同法再交涉义务的理论构成应为:再交涉义务的适用范围主要是在情事变更的场合;情事变更原则有双重法律效果,第一重效果为再交涉义务的履行,第二重效果为合同变更或者合同解除;再交涉义务在第一层次上,是以促进和保障当事人的自主交涉为目的的行为规范,只有在违反该义务时,才在第二层次上作为裁判规范实现法律的惩罚功能,表现为诉讼上的合同变更、合同解除及损害赔偿等;在再交涉义务中,应该更加重视请求再交涉的义务。
[Abstract]:Japan and Germany are the scholars renegotiation location must complete the steps after the procedure before litigation shall exercise the contract change request right and the right to terminate is to promote the independent representations of code of conduct for the purpose. In the interpretation of the contract law of our country, the theory of renegotiation obligations should be: the scope of renegotiation is mainly in the change of circumstances of the situation; the principle of change of circumstances has dual legal effect, the first effect to fulfill the obligation to re negotiate the second effect as the contract change or termination of the contract; renegotiation obligations in the first level, is to promote and safeguard the autonomy for the purpose of negotiation behavior only, in violation of the obligations, only in the second level as the referee implementation of legal punishment functional specification, performance for the litigation contract change, the termination of the contract and damages in again; In the obligation of negotiation, more attention should be paid to the obligation to negotiate.

【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究项目“再交涉义务研究”(项目批准号08JA820021)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D931.3;D951.6;D923.6
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释(二〉》(以下简称《合同法司法解释(二)》)第26条规定:“合同成立以后客观情况发生了当事人在订立合同时无法预见的、非不可抗力造成的不属于商业风险的重大变化,继续履行合同对于一方当事人明显

【相似文献】