辨正地认识“法治”的地位和作用

发布时间：2018-02-10 11:13

本文关键词： 法治礼法物利人伦　出处：《山东社会科学》2015年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：长期以来,国内外学术界流行着一种模糊的,甚至可以说是错误的认识,以为法治的作用是万能的,地位是至高无上的,西方式的法治是唯一正确的社会治理模式,并因而贬低中国文化,认为中国传统上法律与道德混淆不分,重人治,轻法治,非但未能走上现代文明,反而导致了中国近代以来的落后和屈辱。本文认为,中国传统文化既强调人的内心自觉,又重视外在的规范约束,主张内外兼治,礼乐双修,从而实现社会的和谐有序。本文还认为,中西法律所塑造和期待的"人"截然不同,前者重人伦,后者重物利,这也是促使中西法制异趣的关键所在。法治的作用是有限的,不可过度拔高,必须在一定的道德、伦理、价值观念以及教育、文化和经济体制等条件配合下方能发挥正面的、积极的效用。中国传统的社会治理模式并未过时,不但仍有其合理性和生命力,而且从长远的意义上看,乃是最健康、最理想、最具可持续性的社会发展模式。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the academic circles at home and abroad have been popular with a vague, or even mistaken, understanding that the role of the rule of law is omnipotent, that the status is paramount, and that the rule of law in the western way is the only correct social governance model. Thus belittling Chinese culture, thinking that the Chinese tradition of law and moral confusion, the rule of law and neglect of the rule of law, not only failed to walk on the modern civilization, but led to the backwardness and humiliation since the modern times of China. Chinese traditional culture not only emphasizes the inner consciousness of human beings, but also stresses the external normative constraints, and advocates both internal and external governance, ritual and music, so as to achieve a harmonious and orderly society. This article also holds that the "human" shaped and expected by Chinese and Western laws are quite different from each other. The former focuses on human relations and the latter on interests, which is also the key to promoting the different interests of Chinese and Western legal systems. The role of the rule of law is limited and must not be over-exalted. It must be based on certain morals, ethics, values and education. Cultural and economic systems can play a positive and positive role in the following conditions. China's traditional social governance model is not out of date. Not only does it still have its rationality and vitality, but in the long run, it is the healthiest and the most ideal. The most sustainable model of social development.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“《大清律例》疑难条文及相关制度背景考论”(项目编号:12BFX016) 清华大学自主科研项目“清代回变与清代法制”(项目编号:2014z04082)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】