美国雇员精神痛苦损害赔偿判例研究及启示

发布时间：2018-02-23 23:15

本文关键词： 严重精神痛苦不当解雇职场性骚扰自由裁量惩罚性赔偿　出处：《燕山大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在我国,雇员精神痛苦是当前理论界和实务界、公众和媒体共同关注的热点话题。随着职场压力的不断增大,处于优势地位的雇主或者管理者,在工作的过程中常常会利用自己的优势实施一些不当行为对雇员的精神权益加以侵犯,然而我国现行法律并不能对雇员的精神痛苦加以救济,理论研究也处于初期阶段。笔者选择撰写本文,以期望弥补该领域的研究空白,并为立法及司法提供参考。本文主要采用了三种研究方法(比较借鉴的研究方法、交叉研究的方法、案例研究的方法),实现了三种结合(国内和国外相结合、实体和诉讼相结合、理论和实践相结合),并贯穿于全文。本文在结构上除了导论以及结论外,共包三章。第一章从精神痛苦的含义及历史沿革入手,着重阐述了雇员精神痛苦损害赔偿责任认定的要件。第二章从判例的角度阐述了常见的两种雇员精神痛苦的诉讼类型(不当解雇和职场性骚扰导致的雇员精神痛苦)。第三章阐述了美国雇员精神痛苦损害赔偿制度对我国的立法启示。我国目前尚未有关于雇员精神痛苦损害赔偿的专门立法,传统的精神痛苦损害赔偿制度又不能有效解决雇员精神权益问题,但是目前我国的雇员也在遭受着精神痛苦,“有损害就应当有救济”。笔者论述了美国雇员精神痛苦损害赔偿的借鉴价值,从社会基础、立法基础、司法基础三个方面阐释了引进此制度的正当性,最后对我国相关制度提出完善建议。
[Abstract]:In China, employees' mental distress is a hot topic of common concern in the theoretical and practical circles, the public and the media. With the increasing pressure in the workplace, employers or managers in an advantageous position, In the process of work, we often take advantage of our own advantages to carry out some improper behavior to infringe upon the mental rights and interests of employees. However, the current law of our country can not remedy the mental suffering of employees. The author chooses to write this article in order to make up for the blank in this field and to provide reference for legislation and judicature. The method of cross-research and the method of case study have realized three kinds of combination (domestic and foreign, entity and litigation, theory and practice, and run through the full text. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper consists of three chapters. The first chapter begins with the meaning and historical evolution of mental pain. The second chapter expounds the common two types of litigation (improper dismissal and workplace sexual harassment caused by employees' mental pain) from the perspective of case law. The third chapter expounds the legislative enlightenment of American employees' mental suffering compensation system to our country. At present, there is no special legislation on compensation for employees' mental suffering damage in our country. The traditional system of compensation for mental pain and suffering can not effectively solve the problem of employees' spiritual rights and interests. But at present, the employees in our country are also suffering from mental pain, "there should be relief if there is damage". The author discusses the reference value of compensation for mental suffering of American employees, from the social basis, the legislative basis, Three aspects of the judicial basis explain the legitimacy of the introduction of this system, and finally put forward suggestions to improve the relevant system in our country.
【学位授予单位】：燕山大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D971.2;D923

【相似文献】