清代土地权利中的“坟禁”习俗探析——基于巴县档案为中心的考察
发布时间:2018-02-26 10:17
本文关键词: 坟禁 田土契约 土地权利 物权法 出处:《甘肃政法学院学报》2013年03期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:在清代社会,"坟禁"是一种重要的民间习俗。清代法律对于官山上的"坟禁"大小作了强制性规定,但是私人之间则可以通过契约对"坟禁"的大小进行自由设定,法律并不作太多干预。由于"禁步"不仅关涉土地权利,而且还同风水观念、孝义伦理相关联,由"坟禁"而引发的"田土"争讼就比较常见。官府在审断官山上因"坟禁"而引发的讼案时会参照《大清律例》的相关规定,同时也会尊重私人之间的"田土"契约,如果"坟禁"既非官山,又没有"田土"契约进行设定时,官府则会认同当地的民间习俗。由此可见,清代官府对于"坟禁"问题的处理原则同现行的《物权法》具有惊人的相通性。
[Abstract]:In the Qing Dynasty, "grave ban" was an important folk custom. The Qing law made mandatory provisions on the size of the "grave ban" on the Guanshan Mountains, but private individuals were free to set the size of the "grave ban" by contract. The law does not interfere too much. Because the ban is not only related to land rights, but also to the concept of feng shui and the ethics of filial piety. Disputes over "land and land" caused by the "grave ban" are quite common. In adjudicating cases brought by the "grave ban" on the official Hill, the government will refer to the relevant provisions of the Qing Dynasty laws and regulations, and will also respect the "land and land" contracts between private individuals. If the "grave ban" is neither a Guanshan nor a "field land" contract to be set up, the government will identify with the local folk customs. Thus it can be seen. In Qing Dynasty, the principle of dealing with the question of "grave ban" is similar to the present property Law.
【作者单位】: 广东惠州学院政法系;
【基金】:2011年教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目《清代中期坟产争讼问题研究——基于巴县档案为中心的考察》(项目批准号:11YJCZH181)之阶段性研究成果
【分类号】:D929;D922.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 肖泽晟;;坟主后代对祖坟的权益[J];法学;2009年07期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 任志强;;明清时期坟茔的纷争[J];安徽大学法律评论;2009年01期
2 刘伯山;;清代徽州塾师的束,
本文编号:1537596
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1537596.html