矫正正义：侵权责任的法哲学基础探析

发布时间：2018-02-27 09:25

本文关键词： 过错责任严格责任矫正正义分配正义经济分析法学　出处：《暨南大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：过错责任与严格责任的划分被视为侵权法的基本理论问题之一。过错责任作为一项归责原则正式被各国立法接纳得益于近代理性主义和自由主义思潮的兴盛。直至19世纪下半叶，工业和科技革命在带来经济飞速增长的同时，也带来了多发的事故和激增的风险，在面对如何解决因此而导致的大量赔偿问题时，过错责任显得力不从心，严格责任应运而生，同时，也催生了责任保险和社会保障制度。所谓侵权责任危机也悄然降临，无论提出危机理论的学者是杞人忧天亦或是未雨绸缪，这一理论都能引起我们对侵权法法哲学基础理论的反思。矫正正义在统一过错责任和严格责任的基础上能够最大限度的保持侵权法的气质，也就是说，，侵权责任如若是对矫正正义的表达，那么就为侵权法更优于其他损害分配制度提出了一个很好的理由。
[Abstract]:The division of fault liability and strict liability is regarded as one of the basic theoretical problems of tort law. As a principle of imputation, fault liability is formally accepted by various countries as a principle of imputation and benefits from the prosperity of modern rationalism and liberalism. By the second half of 19th century, The industrial and technological revolution has brought about rapid economic growth, at the same time, it has also brought many accidents and risks of proliferation. In the face of how to solve the massive compensation problem caused by it, the fault liability appears to be inadequate, and strict liability emerges as the times require. At the same time, it also gave birth to the liability insurance and social security systems. The so-called tort liability crisis also crept in. Whether the scholars who put forward the theory of the crisis were alarmist or prepared ahead of time, This theory can cause us to reflect on the basic theory of the philosophy of tort law. On the basis of unifying fault liability and strict liability, correctional justice can maintain the temperament of tort law to the maximum extent, that is, If tort liability is the expression of corrective justice, it provides a good reason for tort law to be better than other damage distribution system.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】