事实证明抑或法官裁量:民事损害赔偿数额认定的德日经验

发布时间：2018-03-18 12:10

  本文选题：损害赔偿数额　切入点：证明困难　出处：《法学家》2012年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：观念革新与社会进步对传统民事诉讼运作方式提出了挑战,其中包括法官如何认定当事人难以证明的损害数额问题。于此情形下,直接驳回原告的诉讼请求将致当事人被拒于法院大门之外,而欲救济当事人又难以算定损害数额,以至法院进退维谷。裁量认定损害数额属法官自由心证下的法定证明标准的降低。对于法官行使自由裁量权的条件,必须进行限制,即非于举证极为困难时不得行使。至于法官裁量认定的基础,仅涵盖证据资料与口头辩论的全部状况,与通常的自由心证方法有别。
[Abstract]:Conceptual innovation and social progress have challenged the traditional way of operating civil proceedings, including how the judge determines the amount of damage that the parties cannot prove. In this case, If the plaintiff's claim is rejected directly, the party will be excluded from the front door of the court, and it will be difficult to calculate the amount of damage caused by relief to the party concerned. As a result, the court was in a dilemma. The discretion found that the amount of damage was a decrease in the legal standard of proof under the judge's free testimony. The conditions for the judge to exercise his discretion must be restricted. As for the basis of the judge's discretion, it only covers the whole situation of the evidence and oral argument, and is different from the usual method of free evidence.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金西部项目“城市化进程中的社区纠纷解决研究——基于西部十个社区的调查”(项目编号:11XFX026)的部分成果
【分类号】：D951.6;D931.3;DD913;DD915.2
，

本文编号：1629514