“上海声像出版社诉陈某等侵权纠纷案”的案例分析

发布时间：2018-03-21 01:19

本文选题：清算义务人　切入点：民事责任　出处：《兰州大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 本文将综合运用法解释学、法比较学、法经济学、法社会学等研究方法。通过材料的整理,研读相关著述,立足我国法律理论和社会实际,吸收国外最新理论研究成果,结合具体公司法案例,力求对清算义务人恶意侵权和欺诈注销的民事责任做出深刻阐述,并对存在问题提出合理的解决方案。全文由引言、正文和结语三部分组成,其中正文部分包括案情介绍及问题的提出、清算义务人制度、清算义务人恶意侵权和欺诈注销的民事责任及公司清算义务人制度的完善共四个部分。引言：简要概述了所涉论题的研究背景、研究现状以及开展研究工作的理论和现实意义。第一部分：案情介绍及问题的提出。本部分以“声像出版社诉陈某等责任纠纷案”为例,结合案件审理情况和双方争议焦点,提出清算义务人制度、清算义务人恶意侵权和欺诈注销的民事责任等法律问题,以及解决这些问题的理论和现实意义。第二部分：清算义务人制度。本部分运用法解释学、法比较学的方法,结合相关法理和具体案情对清算人和清算义务人进行区分,对清算义务人的主体范围加以界定；从法的公平价值和法的秩序价值两个方面阐释清算义务人民事责任制度构建的价值体现；以“信义义务理论”等为基础,阐释清算义务人侵权民事责任制度构建的法理基础。在我国,清算义务人民事责任制度的构建,更加符合我国的立法现状和司法审判实际：第三部分：清算义务人恶意侵权和欺诈注销的民事责任。本部分详细介绍了清算义务人因作为侵权行为对公司债务承担民事责任的两种情形：(1)恶意侵权,即恶意处置公司财产的民事责任；(2)欺诈注销,即没有经过公司清算程序,以虚假的清算报告骗取公司登记机关办理法人注销登记的民事责任。第四部分：公司清算义务人制度的完善。结语：本部分概括总结了论文涉及的相关法律问题,阐明作者观点。
[Abstract]:In this paper, we will comprehensively apply the methods of law hermeneutics, law comparison, law economics, law sociology and so on. Through the arrangement of materials, we will study the relevant works and absorb the latest foreign theoretical research achievements based on our country's legal theory and social reality. Combined with the specific company law cases, this paper tries to make a deep exposition of the civil liability of the liquidation obligor for malicious infringement and fraud cancellation, and puts forward a reasonable solution to the existing problems. The full text consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The main part includes four parts: the introduction of the case, the system of liquidation obligor, the civil liability of malicious tort and fraud cancellation of liquidation obligor and the perfection of company liquidation obligor system. Introduction: this paper briefly summarizes the research background, research status and theoretical and practical significance of the research. The first part: the introduction of the case and the presentation of the questions. This part takes the case of Acoustic and Video Publishing House v. Chen as an example, combining the trial of the case and the focus of the dispute between the two sides, puts forward the liquidation obligor system. Legal problems such as malicious tort and fraudulent cancellation of civil liability of liquidation obligor, and the theoretical and practical significance of solving these problems. The second part: the liquidation obligor system. This part uses the method of legal hermeneutics and legal comparison to distinguish the liquidator from the liquidation obligor and define the scope of the subject of liquidation obligor. Based on the theory of fiduciary obligation, this paper explains the value embodiment of the civil liability system of liquidation obligor from two aspects: the fair value of law and the value of order value of law. In China, the construction of civil liability system of liquidation obligor is more in line with the current situation of legislation and the reality of judicial trial in our country. Part three: civil liability of liquidation obligor for malicious infringement and fraud cancellation. That is to say, the civil liability of maliciously disposing of the property of the company is written off fraudulently, that is, without going through the liquidation procedure of the company, the civil liability of the company registration authority for deregistration of the legal person is deceived by the false liquidation report. Part 4th: the perfection of company liquidation obligor system. Conclusion: this part summarizes the relevant legal issues involved in the thesis and clarifies the author's point of view.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D920.5

【参考文献】