法庭话语中礼貌现象研究

发布时间：2018-03-26 11:49

本文选题：礼貌　切入点：礼貌原则　出处：《华中师范大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 法庭话语是一种以目的为导向、围绕特定任务展开的典型的机构性话语。与此同时,礼貌是人类文明和进步的标志,是人类活动的一条准绳。作为一种社会活动,语言活动同样受到这一原则的约束。本文采用现有的理论框架,描述性和实证性相结合,从语言礼貌的角度对中国法庭话语进行了初步的研究。同时,本文也试图证明顾曰国提出的礼貌原则同样适用于法庭话语这一特殊的机构话语。本文以两场中国民事审判和刑事审判录音转写为语料,对此进行了定性分析。第一部分简要介绍了本选题的研究背景、研究目的、研究方法和涉及的语料。第二部分是文献综述,简要介绍了国内外对法庭话语及礼貌进行研究的一些成果。笔者发现国内学者甚少研究中国法庭话语中的礼貌现象,特别是用顾曰国提出的中国式的礼貌原则分析中国法庭话语的研究根本没有。第三部分理论综述,首先介绍了利奇的礼貌原则,而后引出对我国学者顾曰国提出的礼貌原则的介绍,并介绍了布朗和列文森的面子保全理论及廖美珍的目的原则,最后提出了适用于本文研究的理论框架:以顾曰国的礼貌原则、面子保全理论为指导,分析法庭话语中的礼貌现象,然后采用目的原则对其进行解释。第四部分,笔者对本文所选取的四个语料进行了分析,肯定了中国法庭话语中存在中国式的礼貌现象和不礼貌现象,并在语料中辨别出三种礼貌策略:积极礼貌策略、消极礼貌策略和非公开的礼貌策略。而后,采用廖美珍的目的原则来解释庭审话语中的礼貌现象及采用不同礼貌策略的原因:参与者各自不同的目的及权利关系。第五部分为结论部分,通过对中国庭审语料的描述性和实证性相结合的分析,本文认为,顾曰国虽是在中国传统文化背景下提出的有中国特色的礼貌原则,但对中国庭审话语这样一种机构话语同样适用,含有丰富的语用意义:同时布朗和列文森的面子保全理论及廖美珍的目的原则在解释机构话语语言运用的礼貌现象中同样具有解释力。最后笔者对整篇论文作了小结,还指出了本文的局限性。本文首次采用顾曰国的礼貌原则分析中国的法庭话语,以期能提高中国庭审参与者的口头表达能力和应变能力。本文只是首次的尝试,不足之处还很多,这个题目有待做的更深更大。
[Abstract]:Court discourse is a kind of typical institutional discourse which is oriented by purpose and revolves around a particular task. At the same time, politeness is a symbol of human civilization and progress and a yardstick of human activities. Language activities are also constrained by this principle. This paper, using the existing theoretical framework and combining descriptive and positivism, makes a preliminary study of Chinese court discourse from the perspective of linguistic politeness. This paper also tries to prove that the politeness principle proposed by Gu Yueguo is also applicable to the special institutional discourse of court discourse. In this paper, two Chinese civil trials and criminal trials are recorded and analyzed qualitatively. The first part briefly introduces the research background and purpose of this topic. The second part is a literature review, which briefly introduces some achievements in the study of court discourse and politeness at home and abroad. The author finds that domestic scholars seldom study politeness phenomena in Chinese court discourse. In particular, there is no research on the analysis of Chinese court discourse with the Chinese politeness principle put forward by Gu Yueguo. In the third part, the author introduces Leech's politeness principle. Then it introduces the politeness principle put forward by Gu Yueguo, a Chinese scholar, and introduces Brown and Levinson's theory of saving face and Liao Meizhen's principle of purpose. Finally, the theoretical framework applicable to this study is put forward: under the guidance of Gu Yueguo's politeness principle and face-saving theory, the politeness phenomenon in court discourse is analyzed, and then explained by the Skopos principle. The author analyzes the four corpus selected in this paper, confirms the existence of Chinese politeness and impoliteness in Chinese court discourse, and identifies three politeness strategies in the corpus: positive politeness strategy. Negative politeness strategies and non-public politeness strategies. Then, Using Liao Meizhen's Skopos principle to explain the politeness phenomenon in court discourse and the reasons for adopting different politeness strategies: the participants have different aims and rights. The fifth part is the conclusion. Based on the analysis of the descriptive and empirical features of the Chinese trial corpus, this paper holds that although Gu Yueguo is a politeness principle with Chinese characteristics put forward under the background of Chinese traditional culture, But it also applies to a kind of institutional discourse such as China's trial discourse. At the same time, Brown and Levinson's face saving theory and Liao Meizhen's Skopos principle have the same explanatory power in explaining the politeness phenomenon in the use of institutional discourse language. Finally, the author makes a brief summary of the whole thesis. The limitations of this paper are also pointed out. This paper first uses Gu Yue Guo's politeness principle to analyze Chinese court discourse in order to improve the oral expression and adaptability of Chinese court participants. The subject needs to be done deeper and bigger.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D90-055;H13

【引证文献】