《钦定台规》初探

发布时间：2018-04-05 19:10

本文选题：《钦定台规》　切入点：清代监察法　出处：《湘潭大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 《钦定台规》是清代最为系统完整的一部监察法规,在中国古代监察法制史上具有重要意义。关于清代监察制度的研究,学界已取得不少成果,但尚未有人从法律文本的角度对《台规》进行专门论述。因此,研究这部法律,挖掘其中蕴含的内容和思想,并对它作出客观评价,是颇具学术价值的。本文之初,即从介绍乾隆、嘉庆、道光、光绪四朝《台规》的版本和流传情况入手,然后展开论述。文章详细论述了法典对清代监察机构的设置、监察内容以及监察职官管理制度的规定;深入剖析了法典所体现的皇权至上、恩威并施、重视司法监察、广开言路等监察法律思想;结合清代监察官员的执法状况及其权力被削弱的状况,探讨了法律的实际运行状态和实施效果。最后,文章分析了《钦定台规》在整个古代监察法律体系中的重要地位,并试图对法典的利弊作出客观评价。在论证中,本文并不一味轻信《台规》的规定,而是将其与其他典籍记载与实际运行相验证,探究法规内容的真实性与合理性,分析法律规定与实际操作之间的相合与歧异,进而提出自己的观点。文章在吸收清代政治史、法制史等学科研究成果的基础上,比较系统全面地考察了《台规》的主要内容和立法特点,肯定了这部监察法的积极意义,就都察院长官名称更改时间、稽察宗室御史处是否一度停置、清代言官的实际权力是扩大还是缩小等具体问题,提出了自己的一点浅见。
[Abstract]:As the most systematic and complete supervisory law in the Qing Dynasty, the Imperial Rule of Taiwan is of great significance in the history of the legal system of supervision in ancient China.There have been many achievements in the research of the supervision system in Qing Dynasty, but no one has made a special exposition on Taiji from the angle of legal text.Therefore, it is of academic value to study this law, dig out its contents and ideas, and make an objective evaluation of it.At the beginning of this paper, it begins with the introduction of the versions and the circulation of Qianlong, Jiaqing, Daoguang and Guang Xu in the four dynasties.The article discusses in detail the establishment, supervision content and the regulation of supervisory official management system in the Qing Dynasty, and deeply analyzes the imperial power supremacy embodied in the Code, the combination of grace and power, and the emphasis on judicial supervision.Combined with the law enforcement situation and the weakening of the power of the supervisory officials in the Qing Dynasty, this paper probes into the actual operation and effect of the law.Finally, the article analyzes the important position of "Qinding Tai Regulation" in the whole ancient supervisory legal system, and tries to make an objective evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of the code.In the argumentation, this paper does not blindly believe in the provisions of the "Taiwan regulations", but verifies them with the records of other classics and their actual operation, probes into the authenticity and rationality of the contents of the laws and regulations, and analyzes the consistency and differences between the laws and regulations and the actual operation.And then put forward his own point of view.On the basis of absorbing the research achievements of the Qing Dynasty's political history and the history of legal system, the article systematically and comprehensively examines the main contents and legislative characteristics of the Taiwan regulations, and affirms the positive significance of this supervisory law.On the specific problems of changing the name of the chief of the capital court, checking whether the imperial history office of the imperial family was stopped for a time, and whether the actual power of the speech officer in the Qing Dynasty was enlarged or reduced, the author put forward his own simple views.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D929

【参考文献】