兰某诈骗案的定性研究

发布时间：2018-04-11 11:34

  本文选题：诈骗罪 + 合同诈骗罪　； 参考：《重庆大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：诈骗罪是涉及财产类型的古老的犯罪，虽然理论界对其研究较早，但由于我国社会经济的快速发展，使得刑法理论界对诈骗罪的传统研究已稍显滞后、同时我国诈骗罪立法本身也存在一定的不完善性。目前对于如何正确认定该罪，在刑法理论上存在着较多的疑点和分歧，实践中，也存在着法律依据不统一、办案机关认识不一致等现象，严重影响了司法实践的顺利开展，导致该罪成为司法人员难以把握的实务难点之一。鉴于上述情况，笔者综合梳理现有的各种法学理论与观点，通过案例分析等研究方法，围绕诈骗罪司法认定中的具体难点，以一件司法实践中的真实且典型的案例为引子，进行了一些初步的探讨，以期有助于司法实践中对本罪定性的准确把握和认定。 全文约两万字，主要内容如下： 第一部分，介绍了案件的基本情况，然后指出案件的分歧意见和争议的焦点。 第二部分探讨了罪与非罪的问题，主要集中于合同诈骗罪与民事合同欺诈的区分。 第三部分分析了本案是否构成盗窃罪，重点分析了秘密窃取行为，同时结合本案也分析了诈骗行为。 第四部分主要分析了合同诈骗罪与诈骗罪认定中的关键问题，即合同诈骗罪之合同的认定。 第五部分，对诈骗罪在司法实践中常见的问题及原因进行分析，，最后提出防范对策。
[Abstract]:The crime of fraud is an ancient crime involving the type of property. Although it has been studied earlier by the theorists, the traditional research on the crime of fraud has lagged behind because of the rapid development of social economy in our country.At the same time, there are some imperfections in the legislation of the crime of fraud in our country.At present, there are many doubts and differences in the theory of criminal law on how to correctly identify the crime. In practice, there are also some phenomena, such as disunity of legal basis and inconsistent understanding of the organs handling cases, which seriously affect the smooth development of judicial practice.As a result, the crime has become one of the practical difficulties difficult for judicial personnel to grasp.In view of the above situation, the author synthetically combs the existing various legal theories and viewpoints, through the case analysis and other research methods, revolves around the concrete difficulty in the judicial cognizance of the crime of fraud, taking a real and typical case in the judicial practice as the introduction,Some preliminary discussions are carried out in order to help the judicial practice to accurately grasp and identify the nature of this crime.The full text is about 20,000 words, the main contents of which are as follows:The first part introduces the basic situation of the case, then points out the differences of opinion and the focus of the dispute.The second part discusses the problem of crime and non-crime, mainly focusing on the distinction between contract fraud and civil contract fraud.The third part analyzes whether this case constitutes the crime of larceny, focusing on the secret theft, and at the same time, it also analyzes the fraud.The fourth part mainly analyzes the key problems of the crime of contract fraud and the crime of fraud, that is, the determination of the contract of the crime of contract fraud.The fifth part analyzes the common problems and causes of the crime of fraud in judicial practice, and finally puts forward preventive countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.35;D920.5


本文编号：1735868