应收账款质押案例分析
发布时间:2018-04-14 01:20
本文选题:应收账款质押 + 应收账款 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:自2009年物权法确立应收账款质押制度以来,目前已是第6个年头了,从这6年的应收账款融资实践还看,承载着缓解中小企业融资难使命的应收账款质押制度,实际效果离预期有一定距离。本文从一则小案例为出发点,探讨在案例中反映出的几个法律争议问题。 本文共有五章,第一章是案情的基本介绍和四个争议点的提出;第二章是基础理论,在讨论争议前对相关基础理论进行简单介绍,阐明应收账款质押的基础原理、权利特征、理论及现实意义和发展的现状;第三章讨论了案例中反映的几个集中争议点,包括登记的效力、质权对应收账款债务人的约束力、通知制度的合理性及效力还有质权的实现机制;第四章,通过前面的争议点的分析,提出了我国现有应收账款质押制度中的不足之处,并对相关制度的完善提出了建议。最后得出结论:我国应收帐款制度较为粗线条的规定一定程度上阻碍了该制度的发展,我国应尽快与国际先进立法接驳,在登记与通知制度、质权人保护、实现机制等方面加以完善。
[Abstract]:Since the property Law of 2009 established the pledge system of accounts receivable, it is now the sixth year. From the practice of accounts receivable financing in the past six years, the pledge system of accounts receivable, which carries the mission of alleviating the financing difficulties of small and medium-sized enterprises, has been carried out.The actual effect is far from expected.Starting from a small case, this paper discusses several legal disputes reflected in the case.There are five chapters in this paper, the first chapter is the basic introduction of the case and the four points of dispute, the second chapter is the basic theory, before the discussion of the dispute, the basic theory is briefly introduced to clarify the basic principle of the pledge of accounts receivable, the characteristics of the right,The third chapter discusses several central points of dispute reflected in the case, including the effectiveness of registration, the binding force of pledge on the debtor of accounts receivable.The rationality and effectiveness of the notification system and the realization mechanism of pledge; chapter four, through the analysis of the previous points of dispute, put forward the shortcomings of the existing pledge system of accounts receivable in China, and put forward some suggestions for the improvement of the relevant system.Finally, the conclusion is drawn: the rough regulation of the system of accounts receivable in our country has hindered the development of the system to some extent, our country should connect with the international advanced legislation as soon as possible, in the registration and notification system, the protection of the mortgagee.The realization mechanism should be improved.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D920.5;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 董学立;物权公示,公示什么?[J];比较法研究;2005年05期
2 赵万一;余文焱;;应收账款质押法律问题[J];法学;2009年09期
3 刘保玉;孙超;;物权法中的应收账款质押制度解析[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2007年04期
4 刘萍;;应收账款担保与《物权法》[J];金融纵横;2007年01期
5 蔡永民;;应收账款质押若干法律问题辨析[J];宁波大学学报(人文科学版);2008年04期
6 陈思晨;;论应收账款质权实现机制的完善[J];现代商贸工业;2010年17期
,本文编号:1747075
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1747075.html