失序与弹压:2011年英国骚乱之诱因与刑事法制的反应

发布时间：2018-04-14 23:22

本文选题：英国骚乱 + 相对剥夺　；参考：《法学家》2012年03期

【摘要】：2011年夏发生的英国骚乱具有深刻的社会政治经济、文化与种族背景,是各种反权威、反社会的合力的总体现。其直接导火索是少数族裔与执法部门之间因种族问题而导致的冲突,其后续发展反映了社会政治经济地位被"相对剥夺"了的下层民众与社会权威机构之间的矛盾。同时,骚乱活动又具有相当程度的盲目性、松散性与自发性。为了修补破碎的英国社会,单纯靠监狱、刑罚、警察与军队的暴力解决不了根本问题,因为刑罚的威慑力应该并且实际上是有限的。以这场骚乱为启示,缓解社会矛盾和维护社会稳定,一方面要解决社会贫富不均与不同利益群体之间的矛盾等深层问题,另一方面需要培养社会公众的、守法的、内在的道德抑制机制,提高法律和执政当局的权威和正当性。
[Abstract]:The British riots in the summer of 2011, with profound social, political, economic, cultural and ethnic backgrounds, are the general manifestation of various anti-authority and anti-social forces.Its direct trigger is the conflict caused by racial problems between ethnic minorities and law enforcement agencies, and its subsequent development reflects the contradiction between the lower class people who have been "relatively deprived" of their political and economic status and the authorities of society.At the same time, rioting activities have a considerable degree of blindness, looseness and spontaneity.In order to repair a broken British society, prison, punishment, police and military violence alone cannot solve the fundamental problem, for the deterrent power of punishment should and is actually limited.Taking this riot as an inspiration, to alleviate social contradictions and maintain social stability, on the one hand, to solve the deep problems such as social inequality between the rich and the poor and contradictions between different interest groups, on the other hand, we need to train the public and abide by the law.The inherent moral restraint mechanism improves the authority and legitimacy of the law and the ruling authorities.
【作者单位】：牛津大学法学院;
【分类号】：D956.1;DD915.3

【相似文献】