晚清官方参与下甘青藏区群体纠纷解决机制——基于查汉大寺撒拉回与尕楞寺藏民纠纷案例的分析

发布时间：2018-04-20 14:21

本文选题：甘青藏区 + 纠纷解决机制　；参考：《云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年05期

【摘要】：晚清时期甘青藏区社会激烈变动,官方、寺院、部落权力彼此消长、交错并行,使得民族之间的交往更加频繁,同时也伴随着民族之间的群体冲突。以循化厅所辖藏区内查汉大寺工撒拉回民与尕楞寺藏民的纠纷及其解决过程分析可以看到,官方参与下的甘青藏区的群体纠纷解决机制主要为:官方处理民族群体纠纷时,尤其是在回藏民族杂居区又是回族的聚居区内,在选择民间调解人时,以当乡调处,但很少选择乡约进行调解;官方解决藏区内民族纠纷时,以"番目"当乡,按照"番例、番规"办理,同时也会采取历史与现实相结合的灵活变通手段;官方常常以"官民互动"的方式促进纠纷的有效解决。
[Abstract]:In the late Qing Dynasty, the society of Gansu and Qinghai-Xizang region changed violently, the power of official, monastery and tribe increased and waned with each other, which made the communication between ethnic groups more frequent and accompanied by the group conflict among ethnic groups at the same time. Based on the analysis of the disputes between the Salah Hui people and the GaLeng Temple Tibetans in the Tibetan area under the jurisdiction of the Xunhua Hall, we can see that the main mechanism for resolving the group disputes in the Gan-Tibet region with the participation of the government is: when dealing with the ethnic group disputes officially, In particular, in the areas inhabited by the Hui nationality in the mixed areas of returning to Tibet, when they choose folk mediators, they are used to mediate between the townships, but they seldom choose the township agreements to mediate; when the official settlement of ethnic disputes in the Tibetan areas is carried out, the "guanbiao" is used as the township, in accordance with the "regulations". It also adopts flexible and flexible means of combining history with reality. Officials often promote the effective resolution of disputes by means of "officials and people interaction".
【作者单位】：贵州师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金(西部项目)“晚清至民国时期甘青藏区社会群体纠纷解决机制研究”(项目编号:11XMZ018) 国家社会科学基金(西部项目)“明清民国时期甘青川边藏区社会控制研究”(项目编号:11XZS013)阶段成果教育厅人文社会科学基金项目“晚清至民国时期湘黔苗疆社会纠纷解决机制研究”(项目编号:12ZC100) 贵州师范大学博士科研启动费资助项目
【分类号】：D929;K252

【相似文献】