美国陪审团废法的正当性考察

发布时间：2018-04-20 22:40

本文选题：陪审团废法 + 陪审团　；参考：《学术论坛》2013年06期

【摘要】：陪审团废法制度的历史是人民争取自由的历史。陪审团废法起源于英国人民反抗王室利用法院迫害批判者,在殖民地时期用于反对殖民者的暴政,在美国建国后它成为了民权运动的守护神。陪审团废法被滥用导致法官限制陪审团废法,法官限制陪审团废法侵犯了被告人享有陪审团审判的权利,也侵犯了陪审团废法倡导者的言论自由。陪审团废法是陪审制内在机制的产物,具有正当性。虽遭质疑和批判,陪审团废法在陪审制国家始终具有存在的正当性。
[Abstract]:The history of jury annulment is the history of the people's struggle for freedom. Jury repeal originated in the British people's resistance to the use of the court to persecute critics, used against colonial tyranny in the colonial period, after the founding of the United States it became the patron saint of the civil rights movement. The abrogation of jury law leads to the judge restricting the abrogation of jury, which infringes on the defendant's right to jury trial and infringes on the freedom of speech of jury abrogation advocate. The juries abrogation is the product of the internal mechanism of jury system, and it has legitimacy. Despite being questioned and criticized, the jury abrogation law has always had the legitimacy in the jury system country.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;美国丹佛大学;广东医学院;
【基金】：最高人民法院2012年审判理论重大课题“人民法院依法独立审判与舆论监督关系”经费西南政法大学2012年度校级重大课题(2012XZZD-01)经费资助
【分类号】：D971.2;DD916

【相似文献】