论亲亲相隐原则的正当性及容隐权制度的构建

发布时间：2018-05-02 19:28

本文选题：亲亲相隐 + 正当性　；参考：《中国政法大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 亲亲相隐指亲属之间有罪互相隐瞒,不告发和不作证的不论罪。亲亲相隐是封建社会法律的一项重要原则,随着国民党“六法全书”的废除,该制度被认为是封建社会的糟粕被丢进历史的垃圾桶。然而,通过研究不难发现,世界上很多国家的法律对亲属包庇、藏匿犯罪人,帮助其伪造、证据的行为都免除刑罚或减轻处罚,这说明亲亲相隐是中西法律的共同选择。追本溯源,令人惊异的是中西两位先哲—孔子和亚里士多德,对这一问题都有过明确的而且极为相似的论述,其能够在中西绵延存续数千年,必有其正当性的基础。本文主要采用价值分析、比较分析等方法全面探讨亲亲相隐制度的合理性,并为我国构建容隐权制度提出建议。第一章主要是用历史研究的方法,首先探讨的是亲亲相隐制度在中国古代的产生和发展,并指出不同历史时期该制度的阶段特征；其次阐述了该制度在西方古代产生的哲学基础,并且对大陆法系和英美法系各国有关亲属容隐权的规定分别进行列举、概括。在这方面,已有学者进行了较为详尽的研究,比如中南政法学院的范忠信教授,这些研究为本文的写作提供了重要的参考。进行历史阐述的原因是要说明亲亲相隐制度是中西法律的不谋而合,进而引出以下问题-亲亲相隐制度的正当性何在? 第二章主要讨论的是亲亲相隐的正当性问题。(1)本章对法律和伦理道德-两种社会调整手段的关系加以论述,从传统伦理的角度探寻亲亲相隐制度的人伦基础,提出亲亲相隐是缘情而制的。(2)期待可能性理论在大陆法系国家已经成为一条重要的责任标准,在我国虽然尚未形成责任认定标准,但是在刑法上也有诸多体现。本节主要论述强制亲属作证、不得隐匿犯罪人是在“强制人们完成不可能完成的任务”,也不符合刑法谦抑性的要求。(3)本章最后讨论了亲亲相隐制度的功能价值,提出该制度是符合法的秩序价值和效益价值的。第三章首先讨论了我国法律对容隐权规定的缺失,并指出了不允许亲亲相隐可能造成“亲属连坐”的不良效果；最后本章从实体法和程序法两个方面对我国构建亲属容隐权提出建议。孔子说：“道之以政,齐之以刑,民免而无耻。道之以德,齐之以礼,有耻且格。”社会主义和谐社会应该是法律秩序和道德秩序和谐发展的社会,法律也不能够违反合理的伦理传统。本文的写作目的是希望立法者能够在批判继承的基础上重新肯定亲亲相隐原则,设置容隐权制度,以期该制度能够在未来的社会和谐、国家的长治久安中发挥重大作用。
[Abstract]:Kinship concealment refers to relatives guilty and mutual concealment, do not report and do not testify regardless of the crime. Concealment of relatives is an important principle of feudal law. With the abolition of KMT's "six laws", this system is considered to be the waste of feudal society was thrown into the historical trash can. However, it is not difficult to find that the laws of many countries in the world shield relatives, hide criminals, help them to forge, and the behavior of evidence is exempted from punishment or mitigated, which shows that concealment of relatives is the common choice of Chinese and western laws. Tracing back to the source, it is surprising that Confucius and Aristotle, two Chinese and Western sages, have had clear and very similar expositions on this issue, which can last for thousands of years in China and West, and must have its legitimate foundation. This paper mainly discusses the rationality of the closeness system by means of value analysis, comparative analysis and so on, and puts forward some suggestions for the construction of implicit right system in our country. The first chapter mainly uses the method of historical research, first of all, discusses the appearance and development of the system in ancient China, and points out the stage characteristics of the system in different historical periods. Secondly, it expounds the philosophical basis of this system in the western ancient times, and enumerates and generalizes the provisions of the civil law system and the Anglo-American law system about the right of relatives' concealment respectively. In this respect, scholars have carried out more detailed studies, such as Professor Fan Zhongxin of the Central South Institute of political Science and Law, which provide an important reference for the writing of this paper. The reason for historical elaboration is to explain that the system of closeness between relatives and relatives is the coincidence of Chinese and Western laws, and then leads to the following questions: where is the legitimacy of the system of closeness between relatives and relatives? The second chapter mainly discusses the legitimacy of the implicitness of kinship. (1) this chapter discusses the relationship between law and ethics-two means of social adjustment, from the traditional ethical point of view to explore the relationship between relatives and relatives hidden system of human relations. The theory of the possibility of expectation has become an important standard of liability in the countries of continental law system. Although there has not yet been a standard of determination of responsibility in our country, there are also many embodiments in the criminal law. This section mainly discusses the forced relatives to testify, not to conceal the criminal in "forcing people to complete the impossible tasks", also does not meet the requirements of the criminal law modesty. 3) this chapter finally discusses the functional value of the system of closeness between relatives and relatives. It is put forward that the system accords with the order value and benefit value of law. The third chapter first discusses the absence of the right of tolerance in Chinese law, and points out that not allowing the relatives to conceal each other may result in the negative effect of "kinship sitting together". Finally, this chapter puts forward some suggestions on the construction of relatives' concealment right from substantive law and procedural law. Confucius said: "Tao to the government, Qi to punish, people avoid and shameless." "the Tao is virtuous, the Qi is courteous, and is ashamed." The harmonious society of socialism should be a society of harmonious development of legal order and moral order, and the law cannot violate the reasonable ethical tradition. The purpose of this paper is to hope that the legislator can reconfirm the principle of relatives' concealment on the basis of criticism and inheritance, and set up the system of concealment right, in the hope that this system can play a significant role in the future social harmony and the long-term stability of the country.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D909;D924

【引证文献】