法律实用主义视角下的法官造法

发布时间：2018-05-03 05:02

本文选题：实用主义 + 确定性　；参考：《苏州大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 在普通法的传统背景之下,美国的一些法律实用主义者从实用的角度出发,认为法官造法具有不可避免性和重要性。因为法官造法反应了人性的需求、是完善法律不定性的客观要求并且可以弥补司法形式逻辑的缺陷。西方国家所谓的有关法官造法的争论是在法律形式主义占主导地位和普通法系这一法律文化背景之下展开的。并且,西方的法官造法不是无限的、任意的造法,它要受到遵循先例原则与空白立法等原则的限制,因此这种法官造法还是以法官是法律的适用者而非制定者为前提的。目前我国法官造法的呼吁声高涨,这具有一定的潜在危险性。因为我国的严格意义上的法律形式主义还未真正得到足够的重视,并且不具有普通法的传统。为此,我国目前不宜大张旗鼓地主张法官造法。
[Abstract]:Under the traditional background of common law, some American legal pragmatists think that it is inevitable and important for judges to make law from a practical point of view. Because the judge law reflects the demand of human nature, it is the objective requirement of perfecting the uncertainty of law and can make up the defect of judicial formal logic. The dispute about the judge's making law in the western countries is carried out under the background of legal formalism and the legal culture of common law system. Moreover, the western judge makes the law is not infinite, the arbitrary law, it must abide by the precedent principle and the blank legislation and so on principle limit, therefore this kind of judge law still assumes that the judge is the application of the law, not the maker as the premise. At present, the appeal of judges to make laws is high, which has certain potential danger. Because the legal formalism in the strict sense of our country has not really been paid enough attention, and does not have the common law tradition. Therefore, at present, our country should not advocate the judge to make the law with great fanfare.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D90

【相似文献】