新加坡国际民事诉讼管辖制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-10 11:39

本文选题：新加坡 + 国际民事诉讼　；参考：《厦门大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 国际民事诉讼中的管辖问题是处理国际民事争议的前提,管辖权的确定又关系到民事争议所适用的实体法,从而影响案件审判的结果,进而影响当事人的实体利益。因此,为了维护本国利益,英美法系冲突法理论和实践通常都十分重视对国际民事诉讼中管辖问题的研究。新加坡承继了英美法系法律传统,有关国际民事诉讼管辖的制度十分健全并具有典型的普通法特色,在新加坡冲突法中具有极为重要的地位和意义。新加坡国际民事诉讼管辖制度由成文法和法院判例构成。确定和限制法院国际民事诉讼管辖权的制度都具有明确的法律基础。新加坡法院在处理国际民事诉讼管辖权冲突方面既接受了英式普通法的有关规则,又在本国的司法实践中对这些规则进行了必要的修改和发展。法官的自由裁量权在解决国际民事诉讼管辖权冲突问题中起到了重要的作用。新加坡国际民事诉讼管辖制度的特色与其过去和现在的法律环境有关,既继承了英国法的制度设计,又具有一定的地方特色和管辖倾向。全文共分为三个部分。第一章介绍了确定新加坡法院国际民事诉讼管辖权的规则,包括成文法的有关规定,也包括普通法中域外送达等规则;第二章论述了限制新加坡法院行使国际民事诉讼管辖权的情形,主要包括国家豁免、外交豁免和外国法院专属管辖事项;第三章详细论述了新加坡解决国际民事诉讼管辖权冲突的可行做法,对不方便法院原则、与管辖协议有关的中止诉讼规则和反诉禁令制度一一做了阐述,并对新加坡法院的有关判例做了介绍和分析。本文在尾论中阐述了新加坡国际民事诉讼管辖制度的特点和扩大管辖的倾向,以及造成这一特点和倾向的历史和现实原因。
[Abstract]:Jurisdiction in international civil litigation is the premise of dealing with international civil disputes, and the determination of jurisdiction is related to the substantive law applicable to civil disputes, thus affecting the outcome of the trial of cases, and then affecting the substantive interests of the parties concerned. Therefore, in order to safeguard the interests of our country, the theory and practice of conflict of laws in common law system usually attach great importance to the study of jurisdiction in international civil action. Singapore inherits the legal tradition of Anglo-American legal system, the system of international civil action jurisdiction is perfect and has typical common law characteristic, and has extremely important position and significance in the conflict of laws of Singapore. Singapore's international civil litigation jurisdiction system consists of statutory law and court jurisprudence. The system of defining and limiting the jurisdiction of international civil action has a clear legal basis. In dealing with conflicts of jurisdiction in international civil proceedings, the courts of Singapore have not only accepted the relevant rules of English common law, but also made necessary amendments and developments to these rules in their own judicial practice. The discretion of judges plays an important role in resolving the conflicts of jurisdiction in international civil litigation. The characteristics of Singapore's international civil procedure jurisdiction system are related to its past and present legal environment. It not only inherits the system design of English law, but also has certain local characteristics and jurisdiction tendency. The full text is divided into three parts. The first chapter introduces the rules to determine the jurisdiction of Singapore courts in international civil proceedings, including the relevant provisions of statutory law, including the common law of extraterritorial service rules; The second chapter discusses the circumstances that restrict the Singapore courts from exercising the jurisdiction of international civil action, mainly including the immunity of the state, diplomatic immunity and the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts. The third chapter discusses in detail the feasible ways to resolve the conflicts of jurisdiction in international civil litigation in Singapore, including the principle of inconvenient courts, the rules of suspension of action related to jurisdiction agreements and the system of counterclaim injunctions. At the same time, it introduces and analyzes the relevant jurisprudence of the Singapore court. This paper expounds the characteristics of Singapore's international civil litigation jurisdiction system and its tendency to expand jurisdiction, as well as the historical and practical reasons for this characteristic and tendency.
【学位授予单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D997.3;D933.9

【引证文献】