我国“媒介审判”现象研究

发布时间：2018-05-12 17:52

本文选题：媒介审判 + 舆论监督　；参考：《吉林大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：上世纪90年代末，“媒介审判”开始进入研究者视野，在相关领域引起广泛讨论。时至今日，“媒介审判”相关研究成果浩如烟海，但“媒介审判”现象仍时有发生。笔者认为，其最直接和最根本的原因，是媒体缺乏应有的自律精神和法律意识。同时，实务界的规范细则尚未出台，学术界关于媒介监督的合理性边界研究较为模糊，这两点也是“媒介审判”现象未得到有效防范的主要原因。新闻媒体对于“新闻自由”的权利诉求与其“公众舆论”代言人的假定身份，为其不当介入司法报道预设了一个看似合理的前提。笔者认为仅孤立的进行个案分析，难免囿于一角。想要真正廓清“媒介审判”与舆论监督的根本区别，体系的梳理“媒介审判”现象发生的成因及机理，应将“媒体审判”置于“传媒与司法”发展进程的宏观视阈之中。本文背倚“传媒与司法”研究领域的丰富学术成果，从以下几个方面论证个人观点：第一章是绪论部分，介绍了本文的研究背景、研究意义、研究现状、理论框架和分析方法。第二章是案例分析，笔者以时间为轴，选取了改革开放以来的四个媒介监督或媒介审判的典型案例。试图通过比较分析、梳理我国媒介监督环境的变化及“媒介审判”现象的流变，呈现媒介监督与“媒介审判”的区别。通过分析笔者发现随着政治及媒介环境的变化，，媒介监督的属性逐渐生发出令新闻界和司法界都不堪烦扰的枝杈，从我国特有的党政权力的延伸及基本的公众权利的让渡两方面，逐渐异化成为媒介从业者个人利益扩张的手段，甚至沦落为媒介公关的工具。第三章是理论分析。笔者围绕舆论监督的内涵、属性、合理性前提及作用进行研究。又针对媒介审判的含义、动因及负面影响展开论述。试图厘清“媒介审判”与媒介监督的界限。第四章是对策研究。笔者从媒介对策及司法对策两方面，进行有效防范“媒介审判”现象的可行性探究。
[Abstract]:At the end of 1990's, Media trial began to enter the field of study and aroused extensive discussion in related fields. Up to now, the related research results of Media trial are vast, but the phenomenon of Media trial still occurs from time to time. The author believes that the most direct and fundamental reason is the lack of self-discipline and legal consciousness of the media. At the same time, the standard rules of the practical circles have not been issued yet, and the study on the rational boundary of media supervision in academic circles is rather vague. These two points are also the main reasons why the phenomenon of "media trial" has not been effectively prevented. News media's right to "press freedom" and its "public opinion" spokesman's assumed identity presupposes a seemingly reasonable premise for their improper intervention in judicial reports. I believe that only isolated case analysis, inevitably limited to a corner. In order to truly clarify the fundamental difference between "media trial" and public opinion supervision, the causes and mechanism of the phenomenon of "media trial" should be sorted out, and the "media trial" should be placed in the macro perspective of the development process of "media and judicature". Based on the rich academic achievements in the field of "Media and Justice", this paper demonstrates personal views from the following aspects: The first chapter is the introduction, which introduces the research background, research significance, research status, theoretical framework and analytical methods. The second chapter is the case analysis. The author selects four typical cases of media supervision or media trial since the reform and opening up to the outside world. Through comparative analysis, this paper tries to sort out the change of media supervision environment and the change of "media trial" phenomenon in our country, and to present the difference between media supervision and "media trial". Through the analysis, the author finds that with the change of politics and media environment, the nature of media supervision gradually gives rise to branches that make the press and judicial circles undisturbed. From the two aspects of the extension of the party and government power and the transfer of the basic public rights, it has gradually become a means for media practitioners to expand their personal interests, and even a tool for media public relations. The third chapter is the theoretical analysis. The author studies the connotation, attribute, rational premise and function of public opinion supervision. It also discusses the meaning, motivation and negative influence of media trial. This paper tries to clarify the boundary between media trial and media supervision. The fourth chapter is the countermeasure research. The author probes into the feasibility of effectively preventing the phenomenon of "medium trial" from two aspects of media countermeasure and judicial countermeasure.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G206

【参考文献】