当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法史论文 >

汉代家庭法研究

发布时间:2018-05-14 16:01

  本文选题:汉代 + 家庭关系 ; 参考:《中国政法大学》2009年博士论文


【摘要】: 本文以汉代家庭法为研究对象,希望通过对汉律中调整家庭关系的条文和汉代家庭关系实态的考察,归纳出汉代家庭法的立法宗旨和时代特点,也试图通过对传世文献和出土文献材料的爬梳、考辨,对学界一些素有争议的问题表述一孔之见。 本文的内容大致可分为四部分。 第一部分是对汉及汉以前的家庭法进行回顾。本部分首先简要回顾汉以前的家庭法状况,再从汉代家庭法的渊源和理念入手,对汉代家庭法的基本状况进行梳理。 第二部分是对汉代家庭法的重要概念——“同居”的含义进行考订。围绕着汉代“同居”的含义,学界历来存在以下几个争论的焦点:一是“同居”是否需要具备“同籍”、“同财”两个要件,二是“同居”是否包括父母及妻子等最近层直系亲属,三是“同居”是否包括奴婢。本部分围绕以上几个争论焦点,利用张家山汉简和里耶秦简等相关新材料对汉代“同居”概念进行考订。此外,本部分还通过对“坐隶,隶不坐户”律文的考释,揭示了主奴法律地位的真实状况。 第三部分是对调整汉代家庭关系的刑事法律规范进行探讨。本部分探讨了汉代家庭犯罪及其刑罚、家庭成员间的刑事连带责任、子女对父母的告发权与诉权等问题。其中,家庭犯罪及其刑罚方面,重点论述了“不孝”罪是否包括告发父母和杀害父母行为;家庭成员间的刑事连带责任方面,则阐述了减免家庭成员连带责任的条件与途径,同时通过对《收律》中“除及论”的辨析,说明了夫妻于连带责任上的差异。在子女对父母的告发权与诉权方面,区分了子女“告”父母的绝对限制与相对限制。 第四部分是对调整汉代家庭关系的民事法律规范进行考察。本部分的内容涉及了汉初法律所认定的非法婚姻类型、汉代妻子的财产权、妾和赘婿的地位、家庭成员继承权益的差异及其原因等问题。本文通过对以上四部分内容的研究,一方面,总结出汉代家庭法的立法宗旨为:要求家庭关系服从国家政治利益、维护家庭的和谐稳定、规范家庭内部的尊卑秩序。另一方面,归纳出汉代家庭法与唐代家庭法相比的时代特点。如,女性在家庭中的法权地位较高;身份、等级界限不明显,家长权相对薄弱等等。
[Abstract]:This article, taking the family law of the Han Dynasty as the research object, hopes to conclude the legislative purpose and characteristics of the family law in the Han Dynasty through the provisions of the adjustment of the family relations in the Han Dynasty and the actual state of the family relations in the Han Dynasty. See you.
The content of this article can be divided into four parts.
The first part is a review of the family law before the Han and Han Dynasties. This part first briefly reviews the status of family law before the Han Dynasty, and then starts with the origin and concept of the family law in the Han Dynasty, and combs the basic situation of the family law in the Han Dynasty.
The second part is an important concept of the family law of the Han Dynasty - the meaning of "cohabitation". Around the meaning of "cohabitation" in the Han Dynasty, there have always been the following controversies in the academic circles: one is whether "cohabitation" needs two important elements of "cohabitation", "cohabitation", "cohabitation", and the other is whether "cohabitation" includes parents and wives, etc. The three is whether the "cohabitation" includes slaves or not. In this part, the concept of "cohabitation" in the Han Dynasty is examined by using the new materials such as Zhang Jiashan Han bamboo slips and Liye Qin bamboo slips. In addition, this part also reveals the real status of the legal status of the slaves by the examination and interpretation of the law of "sitting in the Li and not sitting in the household".
The third part is to discuss the criminal legal norms of the family relationship adjustment in the Han Dynasty. This part discusses the family crime and its penalty in the Han Dynasty, the criminal joint liability between the family members, the children's right to complain to the parents and the right of appeal. Among them, the family crime and its penalty, the emphasis is on whether the crime of "unfilial filial" includes the father of the report. In the aspect of the criminal joint responsibility between the family members and the family members, the conditions and ways of reducing the joint liability of the family members are expounded. At the same time, the differences in the joint and several liability are explained by the discrimination between the "elimination and the theory" in the law. Absolute and relative restrictions.
The fourth part is the investigation of the civil legal norms regulating the family relations of the Han Dynasty. The contents of this part include the types of illegal marriage identified by the law of the early Han Dynasty, the property rights of the wife of the Han Dynasty, the status of concubines and son-in-law, the differences in the inheritance rights of the family members and their reasons. This article through the study of the above four parts, On the other hand, the legislative purpose of the family law in the Han Dynasty is to require family relations to obey the political interests of the state, maintain the harmony and stability of the family and standardize the order of inferiority in the family. On the other hand, the characteristics of the times of the family law in the Han Dynasty and the family law of the Tang Dynasty are summarized. Obviously, parents' rights are relatively weak, and so on.

【学位授予单位】:中国政法大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:D929;D923.9

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 吴荣曾;对春秋战国家长制奴隶制残余的考察[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1987年02期

2 蒋非非;秦代谪戍、赘婿、闾左新考[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1995年05期

3 张世超;秦简中的“同居”与有关法律[J];东北师大学报;1989年03期

4 王彦辉;从张家山汉简看西汉时期私奴婢的社会地位[J];东北师大学报;2003年02期

5 华友根;西汉的礼法结合及其在中国法律史上的地位[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);1995年06期

6 何勤华;《法经》新考[J];法学;1998年02期

7 鲁家亮;;试论张家山汉简《收律》及其相关的几个问题[J];古籍整理研究学刊;2007年02期

8 于振波;从“公室告”与“家罪”看秦律的立法精神[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2005年05期

9 徐世虹;;秦汉简牍中的不孝罪诉讼[J];华东政法学院学报;2006年03期

10 闫晓君;;论张家山汉简《收律》[J];华东政法学院学报;2006年03期



本文编号:1888550

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1888550.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户735f5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com