法国第三人撤销之诉研究——兼与我国新《民事诉讼法》第56条第3款比较

发布时间：2018-05-26 00:30

本文选题：民事诉讼第三人 + 撤销之诉　；参考：《现代法学》2013年03期

【摘要】：第三人撤销之诉是第三人为避免自身利益受损而享有的一种非常上诉手段。第三人撤销之诉作为非常上诉制度的一种,应受"非常上诉"一般条款的制约。第三人撤销之诉是介于生效判决的确定性、法律关系的安定性、第三人利益保护之间的平衡机制。当第三人的利益遭到生效判决的侵害时,第三人撤销之诉是必要且惟一的救济途径。我国新《民事诉讼法》对第三人撤销之诉的条件、提出期限、管辖、法律效果进行了规定。对于第三人撤销之诉而言,我国《民事诉讼法》引进该制度可能造成与当前法律制度不兼容,与司法制度不适应,但是这些问题都可以通过立法和司法解释得以解决,实务部门对新制度的"抗拒"也将逐步缓解。
[Abstract]:Third-party revocation is an extraordinary means of appeal to avoid damage to their own interests. As a kind of extraordinary appeal system, the third party's revocation action should be subject to the general clause of "extraordinary appeal". The third party's action of revocation is a balance mechanism between the determinacy of effective judgment, the stability of legal relationship and the protection of the third party's interests. When the interests of the third party are infringed by the effective judgment, the third party's revocation is the necessary and only remedy. The new Civil procedure Law of our country provides the conditions for the third party to withdraw the action, puts forward the time limit, jurisdiction, and legal effect. As far as the third party is concerned, the introduction of this system in the Civil procedure Law of our country may cause incompatibility with the current legal system and incompatibility with the judicial system, but these problems can be solved through legislation and judicial interpretation. The "resistance" of the substantive departments to the new system will also be eased gradually.
【作者单位】：中山大学法学院;
【基金】：2012年度中山大学人文社会科学青年教师桐山基金项目“法国民事诉讼理论研究”
【分类号】：D956.5;D925.1

【共引文献】