违反许可约款之司法救济——美国司法实践对我国的启示与借鉴

发布时间：2018-06-18 22:06

本文选题：许可 + 承诺　；参考：《北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年01期

【摘要】：从比较法的角度,美国司法实践处理违反许可约款纠纷的相关做法和观点对我国有重要借鉴意义。为合理处理此类纠纷,在诉讼法律关系的释明及责任确定上,第一步区分许可的独占与非独占类型。若系独占许可,则释明为违约之诉,判令承担违约责任;若为非独占许可,则区分违反对象系"条件"抑或"承诺"。"条件"、"承诺"的判断根据其约定的权利是否为知识产权排他性权利及其是否为知识产权立法精神、公共政策赋予许可人的其他合法权益进行。违反"条件",释明为侵权之诉抑或侵权与违约竞合,由原告选择,进而确定相应的侵权责任或违约责任;违反"承诺",则释明仅为违约之诉,责令承担违约责任,作为补充,对实质性违反承诺导致许可被撤销时,仅判令承担侵权责任。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of comparative law, the relevant practices and viewpoints of American judicial practice in dealing with disputes of breach of license terms are of great significance to our country. In order to deal with such disputes reasonably, the first step is to distinguish the exclusive and non-exclusive types of permission in the interpretation of the legal relationship of litigation and the determination of liability. If it is an exclusive permit, it shall be interpreted as an action for breach of contract, and the decree shall be held liable for the breach; if it is not an exclusive permit, the breach shall be distinguished between a "condition" or a "promise". " The judgment of whether the agreed right is an exclusive right of intellectual property and whether it is the spirit of intellectual property legislation, and other lawful rights and interests conferred on the licensor by public policy. The breach of "conditions" shall be interpreted as an action of tort or a combination of infringement and breach of contract, which shall be chosen by the plaintiff, and the corresponding liability for tort or breach of contract shall be determined. If the breach of "promise" is violated, the interpretation is only a complaint of breach of contract and is ordered to bear the liability for breach of contract as a supplement. Where permission is revoked as a result of material breach of commitment, only tort liability is ordered.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学青年项目基金资助(2010YJC840020)
【分类号】：D971.2;DD916

【相似文献】