当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法史论文 >

唐朝赎刑制度研究

发布时间:2018-06-19 05:50

  本文选题:唐朝 + 赎刑 ; 参考:《安徽大学》2010年硕士论文


【摘要】: 唐朝赎刑制度是唐朝时期的一项重要的刑事司法制度。赎刑制度始存在于夏朝,经过历朝历代的发展,至唐朝时已日臻成熟完备,唐朝的赎刑制度适用范围较广,内容规范具体,最能够体现封建赎刑制度的实质,其规范化和制度化在封建社会极具代表性。唐朝赎刑制度是封建社会赎刑制度的典范,是研究赎刑制度的很好的样本。 本文在引言中介绍了赎刑制度的概念、发展历程、研究现状、研究意义,分析了唐朝统治者的法律思想及对赎刑制度的影响。之后从唐朝赎刑制度的研究现状入手,对这一制度从以下几个方面进行分析和研究:一、唐朝赎刑制度的内容。这一部分主要从唐朝赎刑制度的适用对象和限制适用的情况,以及唐朝赎刑制度的等级三个方面阐述了唐朝赎刑制度的具体内容,是从立法的角度,研究静态的唐朝赎刑制度。这是因为研究唐朝赎刑制度首先应当弄清楚唐律是如何规定赎刑制度的。二、唐朝赎刑制度的施行。这一部分主要包括赎刑的方式、赎刑的决定机关、司法官在赎刑适用过程中的责任、徒刑过程中如何改易为赎刑、赎刑与官当的套用、赎刑执行的期限、赎刑给犯罪官吏带来的行政后果以及错判案件中的赎刑如何处置等。三、唐朝赎刑制度的特点。这一部分阐述了唐朝赎刑制度具有的特点,具体包括适用范围广、强化故意与过失的区分、标准明确。四、唐朝赎刑制度的作用。这一部分主要是评价唐朝赎刑制度在当时的社会起到了怎样的作用,概括来说有消极的作用也有积极的作用,本部分对两方面的作用都做了详细的说明。五、唐朝赎刑制度的现代意义。这一部分在研究唐朝赎刑制度的基础上将唐朝赎刑制度的内容与现代赎刑的构建相结合,具体从赎刑制度的适用对象、赎刑制度与财产刑、赎刑制度的原则、赎刑制度的方式四个角度将唐朝赎刑制度与现代法治结合。在鉴别唐朝赎刑制度中的糟粕与精华的同时,对现代刑罚体系提出建议,目的是能够复建赎刑制度,以弥补短期自由刑的不足,体现刑罚的人道主义精神和加强刑罚的预防犯罪作用。 文章结论部分从辩证唯物主义的角度分析唐朝赎刑制度的局限性和积极性,存在了几千年的赎刑制度首先是封建王朝的特权法,贯穿唐朝始终的唐朝赎刑制度也同样由于所处的具体历史环境而不可避免的带有一定的局限性,但是作为唐朝时期一项重要的司法手段,赎刑制度依然发挥了一定的积极作用。对唐朝赎刑制度的分析和总结,对其进行恰当的评价,总结经验构建现代的赎刑制度,对于现代刑罚体系的完善以及社会主义法制的建设具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:The system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty is an important criminal justice system in Tang Dynasty. The foreclosure system began to exist in Xia Dynasty. Through the development of successive dynasties, it was maturing and complete by the Tang Dynasty, and its scope of application was relatively wide, and its contents were standardized and concrete, which could best reflect the essence of the feudal system of redeeming punishment. Its standardization and institutionalization are very representative in feudal society. The system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty is the model of the redeeming system in feudal society and a good sample for studying the system of foreclosure. In the introduction, this paper introduces the concept, development course, research status and significance of the foreclosure system, and analyzes the legal thought of the rulers of the Tang Dynasty and its influence on the foreclosure system. After that, the author analyzes and studies this system from the following aspects: first, the content of the system of redeeming in Tang Dynasty. This part mainly expounds the concrete contents of the system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty from three aspects: the applicable object of the system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty and the situation of limiting its application, as well as the grade of the system of foreclosure in Tang Dynasty. It studies the static system of foreclosure in Tang Dynasty from the angle of legislation. This is because the study of the Tang Dynasty foreclosure system should first of all find out how Tang Law prescribes the foreclosure system. Second, the implementation of the system of redeeming punishment in the Tang Dynasty. This part mainly includes the way of redeeming punishment, the deciding organ of foreclosure penalty, the responsibility of the magistrate in the process of applying the punishment of redemption, how to change it into redeeming punishment in the course of imprisonment, the formality of foreclosure with the official, the time limit of the execution of the foreclosure. The administrative consequences of foreclosure to criminal officials and how to deal with the punishment in misjudged cases. Third, the characteristics of the system of atonement in Tang Dynasty. This part expounds the characteristics of the system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty, including the wide scope of application, the strengthening of the distinction between intent and negligence, and the clear standards. Fourth, the role of the system of atonement in the Tang Dynasty. This part is mainly to evaluate the Tang Dynasty foreclosure system in the society at that time what kind of role, generally speaking has a negative role also has a positive role, this part of the two aspects of the role of a detailed explanation. Fifth, the modern significance of the system of redeeming punishment in the Tang Dynasty. On the basis of studying the system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty, this part combines the content of the system of foreclosure in Tang Dynasty with the construction of modern foreclosure, specifically from the applicable object of the system, the system of foreclosure, the principle of property penalty, and the system of foreclosure. The way of redeem punishment system combines Tang Dynasty redeem penalty system with modern rule of law. While discriminating the dross and essence of the atonement system in the Tang Dynasty, the paper puts forward some suggestions on the modern penalty system, in order to restore the foreclosure system, so as to make up for the deficiency of the short-term free punishment. Embody the humanism spirit of penalty and strengthen the crime prevention function of penalty. The conclusion of the article analyzes the limitation and enthusiasm of the atonement system in the Tang Dynasty from the angle of dialectical materialism. It is the privilege law of the feudal dynasty that has existed for thousands of years. The atonement system of Tang Dynasty, which runs through the Tang Dynasty, also inevitably has some limitations because of its specific historical environment. However, as an important judicial means in the Tang Dynasty, the foreclosure system still plays a positive role. It is of great significance for the perfection of modern penalty system and the construction of socialist legal system to analyze and summarize the system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty, to evaluate it properly and to sum up its experience.
【学位授予单位】:安徽大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D929;D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张兆凯;;赎刑的废除与理性回归[J];北方法学;2008年06期

2 杨武松;唐代官制特权立法考辩[J];太原城市职业技术学院学报;2004年06期

3 毛淑玲;刘金鹏;;刑事法中的推定与无罪推定[J];法学杂志;2009年12期

4 闫晶;;由我国古代赎刑看“赔钱减刑”制度之合理性[J];法制与社会;2009年04期

5 陈嘉俊;论中国古代的赎刑制度──兼议现代以罚代刑的若干问题[J];江苏公安专科学校学报;1998年05期

6 严国庆;从云梦秦简看秦的赎刑制度[J];江苏广播电视大学学报;2000年02期

7 陈怡;;小议中国古代刑罚赎刑[J];科技信息(科学教研);2007年20期

8 赵旭;;宋代赎刑制度考述[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年01期

9 陈谭娟;中国古代赎刑与罚金刑之区别[J];理论月刊;2005年10期

10 胡高飞;;中国传统赎刑及其启示[J];求索;2008年03期

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 陈灵海;唐代刑部[D];华东政法学院;2004年

2 赵旭;法律制度与唐宋社会秩序[D];东北师范大学;2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 蒋建宇;刑罚易科制度研究[D];武汉大学;2005年

2 刘科进;明代赎刑制度的司法特点及其局限性[D];西南大学;2007年



本文编号:2038757

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2038757.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3d9d4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com