清代“慎刑”制度表现与思想传承
发布时间:2018-07-22 15:14
【摘要】:中国传统法律思想是世界法律文化史上的一颗耀眼的明珠,具有不可动摇的重要地位。中国传统法律思想涉猎广泛,内容丰富。“慎刑”思想是中国传统法律思想中独具特色的重要因素,它不仅仅表现在思想层面,同样也表现在制度层面。“慎刑”问题在中国古代的立法和司法体系中占有显赫而尊崇的地位,备受历代统治者的重视。通过对这一思想的发展演变的论述有助于加深对中国传统法律思想的认识和了解。 本文主要分为三章。第一章论述了清代“慎刑”在制度方面的体现,包括在立法、司法、执法方面的具体体现;第二章从思想方面论述了清代慎刑的发展以及影响清代慎刑的背景因素,通过与以往朝代的比较分析探求清代“慎刑”的思想根源,通过论述影响清代“慎刑”的背景因素分析“慎刑”在清代的特点;第三章论述了清代“慎刑”的实践意义及其局限性,并从我国现行刑法中“慎刑”的体现入手探求清代“慎刑”对我国现行刑法的借鉴意义。 本文的第一个创新点是不仅从思想方面论述了慎刑的发展,也从立法、司法等宏观的制度表现方面分析了清代的“慎刑”。本文的第二个创新点是对影响慎刑受到不同态度以及其自身不同的表现形式的各种因素进行深入分析。慎刑是古代和谐观念的体现,对清代慎刑思想以及制度方面的研究有助于加深对中国传统法律文化的认识和了解,另外对中国现行刑事立法、司法的发展具有重要的意义,可为今天构建和谐社会提供借鉴。
[Abstract]:Chinese traditional legal thought is a dazzling pearl in the history of world legal culture and has an unshakable important position. Chinese traditional legal thought dabbles in a wide range of contents. The thought of careful punishment is an important factor with unique characteristics in the traditional Chinese legal thought, which is not only manifested in the ideological level, but also in the system level. The issue of careful punishment occupies a prominent and respected position in the legislation and judicial system of ancient China, and has been attached great importance to by the rulers of the past dynasties. The discussion of the development and evolution of this thought is helpful to deepen the understanding and understanding of Chinese traditional legal thought. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter discusses the embodiment of "careful punishment" in the system of Qing Dynasty, including the specific embodiment of legislation, judicature and law enforcement; the second chapter discusses the development of careful punishment in Qing Dynasty and the background factors that influence the careful punishment in Qing Dynasty. Through the comparative analysis with the previous dynasties to explore the ideological roots of "careful punishment" in Qing Dynasty, and the characteristics of "careful punishment" in Qing Dynasty by discussing the background factors that affect the "careful punishment" in Qing Dynasty; The third chapter discusses the practical significance and limitation of "careful punishment" in Qing Dynasty, and probes into the reference significance of "careful punishment" to our current criminal law from the embodiment of "careful punishment" in the current criminal law of our country. The first innovation of this paper is not only from the ideological aspects of the development of careful punishment, but also from the legislative, judicial and other macro-system performance analysis of the Qing Dynasty "careful punishment". The second innovation of this paper is to analyze the factors which affect the different attitudes of cautious punishment and its own different forms of expression. Careful punishment is the embodiment of the ancient harmonious idea. The study on the thought and system of careful punishment in Qing Dynasty is helpful to deepen the understanding and understanding of Chinese traditional legal culture, and it is also of great significance to the development of Chinese current criminal legislation and judicature. It can provide reference for constructing harmonious society today.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D929
本文编号:2137872
[Abstract]:Chinese traditional legal thought is a dazzling pearl in the history of world legal culture and has an unshakable important position. Chinese traditional legal thought dabbles in a wide range of contents. The thought of careful punishment is an important factor with unique characteristics in the traditional Chinese legal thought, which is not only manifested in the ideological level, but also in the system level. The issue of careful punishment occupies a prominent and respected position in the legislation and judicial system of ancient China, and has been attached great importance to by the rulers of the past dynasties. The discussion of the development and evolution of this thought is helpful to deepen the understanding and understanding of Chinese traditional legal thought. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter discusses the embodiment of "careful punishment" in the system of Qing Dynasty, including the specific embodiment of legislation, judicature and law enforcement; the second chapter discusses the development of careful punishment in Qing Dynasty and the background factors that influence the careful punishment in Qing Dynasty. Through the comparative analysis with the previous dynasties to explore the ideological roots of "careful punishment" in Qing Dynasty, and the characteristics of "careful punishment" in Qing Dynasty by discussing the background factors that affect the "careful punishment" in Qing Dynasty; The third chapter discusses the practical significance and limitation of "careful punishment" in Qing Dynasty, and probes into the reference significance of "careful punishment" to our current criminal law from the embodiment of "careful punishment" in the current criminal law of our country. The first innovation of this paper is not only from the ideological aspects of the development of careful punishment, but also from the legislative, judicial and other macro-system performance analysis of the Qing Dynasty "careful punishment". The second innovation of this paper is to analyze the factors which affect the different attitudes of cautious punishment and its own different forms of expression. Careful punishment is the embodiment of the ancient harmonious idea. The study on the thought and system of careful punishment in Qing Dynasty is helpful to deepen the understanding and understanding of Chinese traditional legal culture, and it is also of great significance to the development of Chinese current criminal legislation and judicature. It can provide reference for constructing harmonious society today.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D929
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴朝军;;中国古代矜恤思想及制度实践述论[J];重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年02期
2 韩春光;中国传统的“慎刑”思想及其现代价值[J];当代法学;2002年04期
3 王称心;构建和谐社会的法治分析[J];法学杂志;2005年03期
4 陈兴良;;宽严相济刑事政策研究[J];法学杂志;2006年01期
5 田文昌;颜九红;;简论中国刑罚制度改革[J];法学杂志;2006年01期
6 周道鸾;;关于完善死刑复核程序的几个问题[J];法学杂志;2006年03期
7 刘昂;;酷刑概念解析[J];法学杂志;2007年05期
8 武树臣;;如何面对中国传统法律文化遗产[J];法学家;2007年05期
9 高鸿钧;;关于传统法研究的几点思考[J];法学家;2007年05期
10 赵秉志;中国逐步废止死刑论纲[J];法学;2005年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 赵秉志;[N];法制日报;2003年
,本文编号:2137872
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2137872.html