德沃金权利思想研究
发布时间：2018-08-26 13:08
【摘要】：“自然法权（权利）为何存在、如何存在、怎样规范？”这是贯穿德沃金思想脉络最为核心的线索。 自然法权为何存在？法理学是政治哲学的一部分，这发源于更为深广的道德领域。更确切地说，，这种政治道德背景是保证每个人平等地位而追求最佳资源分配状况的资源平等命题。这种融贯原则的核心在于每个人平等尊重自己和他人，同时必须发展属于自己的本真性的尊严原则命题。 自然法权如何存在？司法解释权利的过程的就是认可尊严的过程，是将权利的背景自然性逐步正式化，转变为制度形式的过程。道德权利是自然法权的幼年期，经过司法解释的“转正”，原本的自然权利就成了法律权利——权利命题。 怎样规范自然法权？自然法权作为政治道德概念，其性质最终是价值性（尤其是道德性）。法律的客观性最终取决于价值领域的客观。这是一种不同于科学客观的客观，是需要经过理性论辩证成，能够信服自己并信服其他人，并最终实现多种本真价值间的融会贯通、协调统一，让每一项价值（包括对手价值）最后都是赢家——价值统一命题。政治道德的客观真理在具体法律个案中的映射就是每一项案件有既事实上符合又价值上证成对象实践的最佳解释，这就是该案的唯一正解。
[Abstract]:"Why do natural law rights (rights) exist, how do they regulate them?" This is the most central clue that runs through the thread of Dworkin's thought. Why does the right of natural law exist? Jurisprudence is a part of political philosophy, which originates from the broader realm of morality. More precisely, this political and moral background is a proposition of resource equality to ensure everyone's equal status and to pursue the best resource allocation. The core of this principle lies in the equal respect for oneself and others, and the development of the principle of dignity which belongs to one's own truth. How does the right of natural law exist? The process of judicial interpretation of rights is the process of recognizing dignity, which is the process of gradually formalizing the background of rights and transforming them into institutional forms. Moral right is the infancy of natural legal right. After judicial interpretation, the original natural right becomes legal right-right proposition. How to regulate the right of natural law? As a concept of political morality, the nature of the right of natural law is value (especially morality). The objectivity of law ultimately depends on the objectivity in the field of value. This is a kind of objectivity different from scientific objectivity. It needs to be dialectically formed by rational theory, be able to convince itself and convince other people, and finally realize the integration and harmonization of various true values. Let every value (including the rival value) end up as a winner-a unified proposition of value. The reflection of the objective truth of political morality in the specific legal cases is that every case has the best explanation of both the fact and the value of the object practice, which is the only correct solution of the case.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D909.1
本文编号：2204957
[Abstract]:"Why do natural law rights (rights) exist, how do they regulate them?" This is the most central clue that runs through the thread of Dworkin's thought. Why does the right of natural law exist? Jurisprudence is a part of political philosophy, which originates from the broader realm of morality. More precisely, this political and moral background is a proposition of resource equality to ensure everyone's equal status and to pursue the best resource allocation. The core of this principle lies in the equal respect for oneself and others, and the development of the principle of dignity which belongs to one's own truth. How does the right of natural law exist? The process of judicial interpretation of rights is the process of recognizing dignity, which is the process of gradually formalizing the background of rights and transforming them into institutional forms. Moral right is the infancy of natural legal right. After judicial interpretation, the original natural right becomes legal right-right proposition. How to regulate the right of natural law? As a concept of political morality, the nature of the right of natural law is value (especially morality). The objectivity of law ultimately depends on the objectivity in the field of value. This is a kind of objectivity different from scientific objectivity. It needs to be dialectically formed by rational theory, be able to convince itself and convince other people, and finally realize the integration and harmonization of various true values. Let every value (including the rival value) end up as a winner-a unified proposition of value. The reflection of the objective truth of political morality in the specific legal cases is that every case has the best explanation of both the fact and the value of the object practice, which is the only correct solution of the case.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D909.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 布莱恩·莱特;吴展;;帝国的终结:德沃金及21世纪法理学——在拉特格斯大学法哲学学院成立庆典上的演讲[J];比较法研究;2007年01期
2 张薇薇;逝去的杯与剑[J];读书;2004年03期
3 方新军;;权利概念的历史[J];法学研究;2007年04期
4 高鸿钧;;权利源于主体间商谈——哈贝马斯的权利理论解析[J];清华法学;2008年02期
5 大卫·贝尔韦斯;马歇尔·柯亨;泮翰殿;;德沃金其人及其思想[J];环球法律评论;1983年01期
6 邓联繁;;基本权利学理分类的意义与方法研究[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年04期
7 郑成良;;权利本位论——兼与封日贤同志商榷[J];中国法学;1991年01期
8 郑成良;;权利本位说[J];政治与法律;1989年04期
本文编号：2204957
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2204957.html
